610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20171728)
1. Development of novel dental nanocomposites reinforced with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS).
Wu X; Sun Y; Xie W; Liu Y; Song X
Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 20171728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of dental restorative composites containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane methacrylate.
Fong H; Dickens SH; Flaim GM
Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 15904694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicomechanical evaluation of low-shrinkage dental nanocomposites based on silsesquioxane cores.
Soh MS; Yap AU; Sellinger A
Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Jun; 115(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 17587299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cyanoacrylate-POSS nanocomposites: novel adhesives with improved properties for dental applications.
Fadaie P; Atai M; Imani M; Karkhaneh A; Ghasaban S
Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):e61-9. PubMed ID: 23570625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites.
Debnath S; Ranade R; Wunder SL; McCool J; Boberick K; Baran G
Dent Mater; 2004 Sep; 20(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 15236943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical properties of a new silorane-based restorative system.
Lien W; Vandewalle KS
Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 20053434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites.
Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 17767952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations.
Thomaidis S; Kakaboura A; Mueller WD; Zinelis S
Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e132-41. PubMed ID: 23790281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types.
Leprince J; Palin WM; Mullier T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):364-76. PubMed ID: 20202096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer.
Eick JD; Kotha SP; Chappelow CC; Kilway KV; Giese GJ; Glaros AG; Pinzino CS
Dent Mater; 2007 Aug; 23(8):1011-7. PubMed ID: 17097138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites.
Ilie N; Hickel R
Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):810-9. PubMed ID: 19286247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of low-shrinkage dental composites containing methacrylethyl-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (ME-POSS).
Canellas TAT; de Almeida Neves A; Dos Santos IKB; de Rezende ARP; Fellows CE; da Silva EM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():566-574. PubMed ID: 30472566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite.
Rodrigues SA; Scherrer SS; Ferracane JL; Della Bona A
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1281-8. PubMed ID: 18374408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Degradation studies on biodegradable nanocomposite based on polycaprolactone/polycarbonate (80:20%) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane.
Raghunath J; Georgiou G; Armitage D; Nazhat SN; Sales KM; Butler PE; Seifalian AM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Dec; 91(3):834-44. PubMed ID: 19051308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of pre- and postpolymerization on flexural strength and elastic modulus of impregnated, fiber-reinforced denture base acrylic resins.
Bertassoni LE; Marshall GW; de Souza EM; Rached RN
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):449-57. PubMed ID: 19033029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical and mechanical properties of an experimental dental composite based on a new monomer.
Atai M; Nekoomanesh M; Hashemi SA; Amani S
Dent Mater; 2004 Sep; 20(7):663-8. PubMed ID: 15236941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structure-property relationships in hybrid dental nanocomposite resins containing monofunctional and multifunctional polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes.
Wang W; Sun X; Huang L; Gao Y; Ban J; Shen L; Chen J
Int J Nanomedicine; 2014; 9():841-52. PubMed ID: 24550674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems.
Ali IL; Yunus N; Abu-Hassan MI
J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):545-9. PubMed ID: 18761582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
