These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20171820)

  • 1. Learning curve in the detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis by using Magnetic Resonance: comparison with surgical results.
    Saba L; Guerriero S; Sulis R; Pilloni M; Ajossa S; Melis G; Mallarini G
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 20171820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement and reproducibility in identification of endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saba L; Guerriero S; Sulcis R; Ajossa S; Melis G; Mallarini G
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 20380608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
    Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the clinical information play a role in the magnetic resonance diagnostic confidence analysis of ovarian and deep endometriosis?
    Saba L; Ajossa S; Ledda G; Balestrieri A; Schirru F; De Cecco CN; Suri JS; Melis GB; Lavra F; Guerriero S
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 92(1096):20180548. PubMed ID: 30730754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results.
    Saba L; Sulcis R; Melis GB; Ibba G; Alcazar JL; Piga M; Guerriero S
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Feb; 24(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 24026621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Location-dependent value of pelvic MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis.
    Krüger K; Behrendt K; Niedobitek-Kreuter G; Koltermann K; Ebert AD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 23478073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment--initial results.
    Hottat N; Larrousse C; Anaf V; Noël JC; Matos C; Absil J; Metens T
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 19584256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Surgical management of rectovaginal septum endometriosis from a continuous series of 50 cases].
    Camagna O; Dhainaut C; Dupuis O; Soncini E; Martin B; Palazzo L; Chosidow D; Madelenat P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Mar; 32(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 15123117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease.
    Bazot M; Darai E; Hourani R; Thomassin I; Cortez A; Uzan S; Buy JN
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 15205479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: preliminary results.
    Bazot M; Stivalet A; Daraï E; Coudray C; Thomassin-Naggara I; Poncelet E
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 22832144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior cul-de-sac obliteration associated with endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation.
    Kataoka ML; Togashi K; Yamaoka T; Koyama T; Ueda H; Kobayashi H; Rahman M; Higuchi T; Fujii S
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 15665220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nodular endometriosis: dynamic MR imaging.
    Onbas O; Kantarci M; Alper F; Kumtepe Y; Durur I; Ingec M; Gursan N; Okur A
    Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 17420957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Studies on diagnosis of endometriosis by magnetic resonance imaging by means of fat saturation technique].
    Okada S
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Mar; 47(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 7699286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The usefulness of computed tomographic colonography for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jeong SY; Chung DJ; Myung Yeo D; Lim YT; Hahn ST; Lee JM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(5):809-14. PubMed ID: 24045261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of (deep infiltrating) endometriosis: the value of diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Busard MP; Mijatovic V; van Kuijk C; Pieters-van den Bos IC; Hompes PG; van Waesberghe JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1117-23. PubMed ID: 20432346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
    Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
    BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep pelvic endometriosis: limited additional diagnostic value of postcontrast in comparison with conventional MR images.
    Bazot M; Gasner A; Lafont C; Ballester M; Daraï E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e331-9. PubMed ID: 21216125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond laparoscopy: 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration.
    Manganaro L; Vittori G; Vinci V; Fierro F; Tomei A; Lodise P; Sollazzo P; Sergi ME; Bernardo S; Ballesio L; Marini M; Porpora MG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 30(10):1432-8. PubMed ID: 22835943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency of MR imaging to orientate surgical treatment of posterior deep pelvic endometriosis.
    Roy C; Balzan C; Thoma V; Sauer B; Wattiez A; Leroy J
    Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 18235982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bladder endometriosis: characterization by magnetic resonance imaging and the value of documenting ureteral involvement.
    Krüger K; Gilly L; Niedobitek-Kreuter G; Mpinou L; Ebert AD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 May; 176():39-43. PubMed ID: 24630292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.