463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20171905)
1. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shear Wave Elastography for Surgically Verified Breast Papillary Lesions: Is It Effective for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions?
Choi HJ; Ko KH; Jung HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2007-2014. PubMed ID: 28708299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses.
Cho N; Moon WK; Kim HY; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20040770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of Elastography Score and Strain Ratio in Combination with B-Mode Ultrasound Avoids Unnecessary Biopsies of Breast Lesions.
Bojanic K; Katavic N; Smolic M; Peric M; Kralik K; Sikora M; Vidačić K; Pacovski M; Stimac D; Ivanac G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):804-816. PubMed ID: 28094066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
