These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

765 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20171937)

  • 1. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
    Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
    Glassman S; Gornet MF; Branch C; Polly D; Peloza J; Schwender JD; Carreon L
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
    Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.
    Carragee EJ; Cheng I
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 20362247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
    Zanoli G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery.
    Slover J; Abdu WA; Hanscom B; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1974-80. PubMed ID: 16924216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?
    Bridwell KH; Berven S; Glassman S; Hamill C; Horton WC; Lenke LG; Schwab F; Baldus C; Shainline M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(20):2220-5. PubMed ID: 17873814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion.
    Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1789-92. PubMed ID: 18628712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
    Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Dimar JR; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 17905316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive study of back and leg pain improvements after adult spinal deformity surgery: analysis of 421 patients with 2-year follow-up and of the impact of the surgery on treatment satisfaction.
    Scheer JK; Smith JS; Clark AJ; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Rolston JD; Eastlack R; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Kelly MP; Kebaish K; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):540-53. PubMed ID: 25700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery.
    Glassman SD; Hamill CL; Bridwell KH; Schwab FJ; Dimar JR; Lowe TG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2764-70. PubMed ID: 18007258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a cross-sectional study in Korea.
    Kong CB; Jeon DW; Chang BS; Lee JH; Suk KS; Park JB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1489-94. PubMed ID: 20535050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.