BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20172123)

  • 1. Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Dewey TM; Brown DL; Herbert MA; Culica D; Smith CR; Leon MB; Svensson LG; Tuzcu M; Webb JG; Cribier A; Mack MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Mar; 89(3):758-67; discussion 767. PubMed ID: 20172123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the aortic valve pathology type different for early and late mortality in concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery?
    Gunay R; Sensoz Y; Kayacioglu I; Tuygun AK; Balci AY; Kisa U; Demirtas MM; Yekeler I
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Oct; 9(4):630-4. PubMed ID: 19625469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass: assessing the impact of multiple grafts.
    Kobayashi KJ; Williams JA; Nwakanma L; Gott VL; Baumgartner WA; Conte JV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 83(3):969-78. PubMed ID: 17307443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Masson JB; Lee M; Boone RH; Al Ali A; Al Bugami S; Hamburger J; John Mancini GB; Ye J; Cheung A; Humphries KH; Wood D; Nietlispach F; Webb JG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 20665855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of coronary artery disease on indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and on procedural outcomes.
    Gautier M; Pepin M; Himbert D; Ducrocq G; Iung B; Dilly MP; Attias D; Nataf P; Vahanian A
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Sep; 7(5):549-55. PubMed ID: 21930458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional aortic valve replacement in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and previous coronary artery bypass grafting in the era of interventional approaches.
    Redlich K; Khaladj N; Peterss S; Pichlmaier M; Shrestha M; Hoy L; Haverich A; Hagl C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 21256760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-risk patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: management and outcomes.
    Dewey TM; Brown DL; Das TS; Ryan WH; Fowler JE; Hoffman SD; Prince SL; Herbert MA; Culica D; Mack MJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 86(5):1450-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 19049730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality.
    Melby SJ; Zierer A; Kaiser SP; Guthrie TJ; Keune JD; Schuessler RB; Pasque MK; Lawton JS; Moazami N; Moon MR; Damiano RJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1651-6; discussion 1656-7. PubMed ID: 17462374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concomitant coronary intervention is associated with poorer early and late clinical outcomes in selected elderly patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Griese DP; Reents W; Tóth A; Kerber S; Diegeler A; Babin-Ebell J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Jul; 46(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24819362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in the VA population.
    Alsoufi B; Karamlou T; Slater M; Shen I; Ungerleider R; Ravichandran P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):12-8; discussion 18-9. PubMed ID: 16480007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EuroSCORE predicts short- and mid-term mortality in combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass patients.
    Kobayashi KJ; Williams JA; Nwakanma LU; Weiss ES; Gott VL; Baumgartner WA; Conte JV
    J Card Surg; 2009; 24(6):637-43. PubMed ID: 20078709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a combined transfemoral procedure.
    Mostafa AE; Geist V; Abdel-Wahab M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 May; 23(5):E102-5. PubMed ID: 21562354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complete revascularization is not a prerequisite for success in current transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice.
    Van Mieghem NM; van der Boon RM; Faqiri E; Diletti R; Schultz C; van Geuns RJ; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP; van Domburg RT; de Jaegere PP
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):867-75. PubMed ID: 23871511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of early and late outcomes of TAVI alone compared to TAVI plus PCI in aortic stenosis patients with and without coronary artery disease.
    Abramowitz Y; Banai S; Katz G; Steinvil A; Arbel Y; Havakuk O; Halkin A; Ben-Gal Y; Keren G; Finkelstein A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Mar; 83(4):649-54. PubMed ID: 24532332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve replacement in isolated severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: long-term survival and ventricular recovery.
    Rabus MB; Kirali K; Kayalar N; Tuncer EY; Toker ME; Yakut C
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2009 Feb; 9(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19196573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of outcomes in patients having isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus combined with preprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Abdel-Wahab M; Mostafa AE; Geist V; Stöcker B; Gordian K; Merten C; Richardt D; Toelg R; Richardt G
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Feb; 109(4):581-6. PubMed ID: 22133754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: safe and feasible replacement alternative approaches in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.
    Salhab KF; Al Kindi AH; Lane JH; Knudson KE; Kapadia S; Roselli EE; Tuzcu ME; Svensson LG
    J Card Surg; 2013 Sep; 28(5):481-3. PubMed ID: 23869423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional aortic valve replacement for high-risk aortic stenosis patients not suitable for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: feasibility and outcome.
    Dimarakis I; Rehman SM; Grant SW; Saravanan DM; Levy RD; Bridgewater B; Kadir I
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 21345690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of same day percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and moderate coronary disease ("hybrid approach").
    Brinster DR; Byrne M; Rogers CD; Baim DS; Simon DI; Couper GS; Cohn LH
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 98(11):1501-3. PubMed ID: 17126658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moderate aortic stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafting patients more than 70 years of age: to replace or not to replace?
    Dagenais F; Mathieu P; Doyle D; Dumont É; Voisine P
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Nov; 90(5):1495-9; discussion 1499-500. PubMed ID: 20971247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 74.