These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20172238)

  • 1. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.
    Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Gregersen VR; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1175-83. PubMed ID: 20172238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
    Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values in Danish Jersey.
    Thomasen JR; Guldbrandtsen B; Su G; Brøndum RF; Lund MS
    Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 22558926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between a sire model and an animal model for genetic evaluation of fertility traits in Danish Holstein population.
    Sun C; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):4063-71. PubMed ID: 19620690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive ability of selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Weller JI; Glick G; Shirak A; Ezra E; Seroussi E; Shemesh M; Zeron Y; Ron M
    Animal; 2014 Feb; 8(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 24433958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficiency of genome-wide selection for genetic improvement of net merit.
    Togashi K; Lin CY; Yamazaki T
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):2972-80. PubMed ID: 21512116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
    Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.
    VanRaden PM; Van Tassell CP; Wiggans GR; Sonstegard TS; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 19109259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic markers for lactation persistency in primiparous Australian dairy cows.
    Pryce JE; Haile-Mariam M; Verbyla K; Bowman PJ; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2202-14. PubMed ID: 20412936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Weigel KA; de los Campos G; González-Recio O; Naya H; Wu XL; Long N; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5248-57. PubMed ID: 19762843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.