295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20172565)
1. A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi.
Yuruk E; Binbay M; Sari E; Akman T; Altinyay E; Baykal M; Muslumanoglu AY; Tefekli A
J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1424-8. PubMed ID: 20172565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.
Shokeir AA; Sheir KZ; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Eassa W; El-Kappany HA
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):706-10. PubMed ID: 16813924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations.
Demirkesen O; Onal B; Tansu N; Altintaş R; Yalçin V; Oner A
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):170-4; discussion 174-5. PubMed ID: 16413356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to shock wave lithotripsy and conservative management.
Krambeck AE; LeRoy AJ; Patterson DE; Gettman MT
J Urol; 2008 Jun; 179(6):2233-7. PubMed ID: 18423676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
Yuruk E; Tefekli A; Sari E; Karadag MA; Tepeler A; Binbay M; Muslumanoglu AY
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):663-7. PubMed ID: 19091339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.
Micali S; Sighinolfi MC; Celia A; De Stefani S; Grande M; Cicero AF; Bianchi G
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1020-2. PubMed ID: 16890682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones.
Inci K; Sahin A; Islamoglu E; Eren MT; Bakkaloglu M; Ozen H
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2189-92. PubMed ID: 17509315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Predictive factors of successful treatment of lower caliceal calculi with Edap LT02 extracorporeal lithotripsy].
Nouri M; Tligui M; Haab F; Flahaut A; Gattegno B; Thibault P
Prog Urol; 2000 Sep; 10(4):529-36. PubMed ID: 11064892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.
Obek C; Onal B; Kantay K; Kalkan M; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V; Tansu N
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. PubMed ID: 11696710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: early and late anatomical and functional results.
Dawaba MS; Shokeir AA; Hafez A; Shoma AM; El-Sherbiny MT; Mokhtar A; Eraky I; El-Kenawy M; El-Kappany HA
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1078-81. PubMed ID: 15311042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy.
Chiong E; Hwee ST; Kay LM; Liang S; Kamaraj R; Esuvaranathan K
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1070-4. PubMed ID: 15922429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones.
Deem S; Defade B; Modak A; Emmett M; Martinez F; Davalos J
Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):739-43. PubMed ID: 21664653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome.
Turna B; Raza A; Moussa S; Smith G; Tolley DA
BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 17552962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
Preminger GM
Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Treatment of the lower pole nephrolithiasis].
Novák K
Cas Lek Cesk; 2005; 144 Suppl 2():45-7. PubMed ID: 16277185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management options for lower pole renal calculi.
Raman JD; Pearle MS
Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18303547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion.
el-Nahas AR; Eraky I; el-Assmy AM; Shoma AM; el-Kenawy MR; Abdel-Latif M; Mosbah A; Abol-Enein H; Shaaban AA; Mohsen T; el-Kappany HA
Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):500-4. PubMed ID: 16979745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of long-term follow-up of patients with conservative management of asymptomatic renal calculi.
Koh LT; Ng FC; Ng KK
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(4):622-5. PubMed ID: 21851532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of stones in caliceal diverticula: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.
Hendrikx AJ; Bierkens AF; Bos R; Oosterhof GO; Debruyne FM
Br J Urol; 1992 Nov; 70(5):478-82. PubMed ID: 1467848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower pole caliceal stone clearance after ESWL: the effect of infundibulopelvic angle.
Lojanapiwat B; Soonthornpun S; Wudhikarn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Sep; 82(9):891-4. PubMed ID: 10561945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
