These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20172941)

  • 1. Treephyler: fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes.
    Schreiber F; Gumrich P; Daniel R; Meinicke P
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 26(7):960-1. PubMed ID: 20172941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.
    Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taxator-tk: precise taxonomic assignment of metagenomes by fast approximation of evolutionary neighborhoods.
    Dröge J; Gregor I; McHardy AC
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(6):817-24. PubMed ID: 25388150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ShotgunFunctionalizeR: an R-package for functional comparison of metagenomes.
    Kristiansson E; Hugenholtz P; Dalevi D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(20):2737-8. PubMed ID: 19696045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual and statistical comparison of metagenomes.
    Mitra S; Klar B; Huson DH
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(15):1849-55. PubMed ID: 19515961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mixture models for analysis of the taxonomic composition of metagenomes.
    Meinicke P; Asshauer KP; Lingner T
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1618-24. PubMed ID: 21546400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MOCAT2: a metagenomic assembly, annotation and profiling framework.
    Kultima JR; Coelho LP; Forslund K; Huerta-Cepas J; Li SS; Driessen M; Voigt AY; Zeller G; Sunagawa S; Bork P
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 32(16):2520-3. PubMed ID: 27153620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. transAlign: using amino acids to facilitate the multiple alignment of protein-coding DNA sequences.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 6():156. PubMed ID: 15969769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Struo: a pipeline for building custom databases for common metagenome profilers.
    de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Ley RE; Youngblut ND
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2314-2315. PubMed ID: 31778148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of multiple metagenomes using phylogenetic networks based on ecological indices.
    Mitra S; Gilbert JA; Field D; Huson DH
    ISME J; 2010 Oct; 4(10):1236-42. PubMed ID: 20428222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of simulated data sets to evaluate the fidelity of metagenomic processing methods.
    Mavromatis K; Ivanova N; Barry K; Shapiro H; Goltsman E; McHardy AC; Rigoutsos I; Salamov A; Korzeniewski F; Land M; Lapidus A; Grigoriev I; Richardson P; Hugenholtz P; Kyrpides NC
    Nat Methods; 2007 Jun; 4(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 17468765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of bioinformatics platforms for comparative genomics. Recent developments of the EDGAR 2.0 platform and its utility for taxonomic and phylogenetic studies.
    Yu J; Blom J; Glaeser SP; Jaenicke S; Juhre T; Rupp O; Schwengers O; Spänig S; Goesmann A
    J Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 261():2-9. PubMed ID: 28705636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SCARF: maximizing next-generation EST assemblies for evolutionary and population genomic analyses.
    Barker MS; Dlugosch KM; Reddy AC; Amyotte SN; Rieseberg LH
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(4):535-6. PubMed ID: 19129211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing and Evaluating Metagenome Assembly Tools from a Microbiologist's Perspective - Not Only Size Matters!
    Vollmers J; Wiegand S; Kaster AK
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169662. PubMed ID: 28099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SOrt-ITEMS: Sequence orthology based approach for improved taxonomic estimation of metagenomic sequences.
    Monzoorul Haque M; Ghosh TS; Komanduri D; Mande SS
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(14):1722-30. PubMed ID: 19439565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities.
    Parks DH; Beiko RG
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 20130030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein signature-based estimation of metagenomic abundances including all domains of life and viruses.
    Klingenberg H; Aßhauer KP; Lingner T; Meinicke P
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(8):973-80. PubMed ID: 23418187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MetaTISA: Metagenomic Translation Initiation Site Annotator for improving gene start prediction.
    Hu GQ; Guo JT; Liu YC; Zhu H
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(14):1843-5. PubMed ID: 19389734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The CHAOS/DIALIGN WWW server for multiple alignment of genomic sequences.
    Brudno M; Steinkamp R; Morgenstern B
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Jul; 32(Web Server issue):W41-4. PubMed ID: 15215346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate phylogenetic classification of variable-length DNA fragments.
    McHardy AC; Martín HG; Tsirigos A; Hugenholtz P; Rigoutsos I
    Nat Methods; 2007 Jan; 4(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 17179938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.