These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The mean-integral representation of rectangles. Macmillan NA; Ornstein AS Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):250-62. PubMed ID: 9529909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A large rectangle delays the perception of a separate small rectangle. King DL Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 2345690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shape discrimination for motion-defined and contrast-defined form: squareness in special. Regan D; Hamstra S Perception; 1991; 20(3):315-36. PubMed ID: 1762874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus alignments in the selection of bigger rectangles by four- and five-year-old children. Shimizu M Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 2):1255-61. PubMed ID: 9450279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial metrics of integral and separable dimensions. Dunn JC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Apr; 9(2):242-57. PubMed ID: 6221069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metacognition in psychophysical judgment: an unfolding view of comparative judgments of mental workload. Petrusic WM; Cloutier P Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):485-99. PubMed ID: 1594438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Area-matching strategies used by young children. Silverman IW; York K; Zuidema N J Exp Child Psychol; 1984 Dec; 38(3):464-74. PubMed ID: 6520584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-dimensional aspect ratio discrimination for shape defined by orientation texture. Regan D; Hajdur LV; Hong XH Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(22):3695-702. PubMed ID: 8976999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceiving the size of trees: biological form and the horizon ratio. Bingham GP Percept Psychophys; 1993 Oct; 54(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 8255711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional salience and judgments of bigness by three-year-old children. Bausano MK; Jeffrey WE Child Dev; 1975 Dec; 46(4):988-91. PubMed ID: 1201673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shape discrimination for rectangles defined by disparity alone, by disparity plus luminance and by disparity plus motion. Regan D; Hamstra SJ Vision Res; 1994 Sep; 34(17):2277-91. PubMed ID: 7941421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 'golden rectangle': some new data. Benjafield J Am J Psychol; 1976 Dec; 89(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 1020768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Random-walk and accumulator models of psychophysical discrimination: a critical evaluation. Heath RA Perception; 1984; 13(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 6473053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A constructive-associative model of the contextual dependence of unidimensional similarity. Wedell DH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):634-61. PubMed ID: 8666957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new method for examining the judgment of bigness. Shimizu M Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 8724936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]