These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2017354)

  • 1. Displacement limit (dmax) of sampled directional motion: direct and indirect estimates.
    Di Lollo VD; Bischof WF
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Feb; 49(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 2017354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strong influence of test patterns on the perception of motion aftereffect and position.
    Fang F; He S
    J Vis; 2004 Aug; 4(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 15330707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of maximum displacement limits for discrimination of motion direction in infancy.
    Wattam-Bell J
    Vision Res; 1992 Apr; 32(4):621-30. PubMed ID: 1413546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Displacement limits, directional anisotropy and direction versus form discrimination in random-dot cinematograms.
    Chang JJ; Julesz B
    Vision Res; 1983; 23(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 6613004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of motion in depth from luminous rotating spirals: directional asymmetries during and after rotation.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 7845768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motion over the retina and the motion aftereffect.
    Swanston MT; Wade NJ
    Perception; 1992; 21(5):569-82. PubMed ID: 1488261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the spatial periodicity of moving gratings on motion response.
    Keck MJ; Montague FW; Burke TP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Nov; 19(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 7429771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations.
    Boynton GM; Ciaramitaro VM; Arman AC
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2968-76. PubMed ID: 16698060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect.
    Bex PJ; Verstraten FA; Mareschal I
    Vision Res; 1996 Sep; 36(17):2721-7. PubMed ID: 8917759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the half-cycle displacement limit of sampled directional motion.
    Bischof WF; Di Lollo V
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(4):649-60. PubMed ID: 1843767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect.
    Cameron EL; Baker CL; Boulton JC
    Vision Res; 1992 Mar; 32(3):561-8. PubMed ID: 1604843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial-contrast movement aftereffect can be rotary: support for link with aftereffect of induced movement.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1991 Oct; 118(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 1813598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion detection is limited by element density not spatial frequency.
    Eagle RA; Rogers BJ
    Vision Res; 1996 Feb; 36(4):545-58. PubMed ID: 8855000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discontinuity limits for the generation of visual motion aftereffects with sine- and square-wave gratings.
    Turano K; Pantle A
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1985 Feb; 2(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 3973758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced motion aftereffect for complex motions.
    Bex PJ; Metha AB; Makous W
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(13):2229-38. PubMed ID: 10343804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual motion aftereffects: critical adaptation and test conditions.
    Wade NJ; Spillmann L; Swanston MT
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(14):2167-75. PubMed ID: 8776483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of different features by the matching process in short-range motion.
    Simpson WA
    Vision Res; 1990; 30(10):1421-8. PubMed ID: 2247952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The discrimination of dynamic orientation changes in gratings.
    Wright MJ; Gurney KN
    Perception; 1995; 24(6):665-79. PubMed ID: 7478906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments.
    Rezec A; Krekelberg B; Dobkins KR
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3035-44. PubMed ID: 15474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception.
    Baker CL; Braddick OJ
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(6):803-12. PubMed ID: 4024478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.