122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20174939)
1. A comparison of early learning curves for complex bimanual coordination with open, laparoscopic, and flexible endoscopic instrumentation.
Spaun GO; Zheng B; Martinec DV; Arnold BN; Swanström LL
Surg Endosc; 2010 Sep; 24(9):2145-55. PubMed ID: 20174939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope.
Spaun GO; Zheng B; Swanström LL
Surg Endosc; 2009 Dec; 23(12):2720-7. PubMed ID: 19360364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bimanual coordination in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: comparing the conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-Scope, and a novel direct-drive system.
Spaun GO; Zheng B; Martinec DV; Cassera MA; Dunst CM; Swanström LL
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 May; 69(6):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19410036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a Visual-Spatial Secondary Task to Assess Automaticity in Laparoscopic Skills.
Castillo R; Alvarado J; Moreno P; Billeke P; Martínez C; Varas J; Jarufe N
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(4):1001-1005. PubMed ID: 29287751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery.
Arain NA; Cadeddu JA; Best SL; Roshek T; Chang V; Hogg DC; Bergs R; Fernandez R; Webb EM; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1170-80. PubMed ID: 22044976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of face-mounted binocular video display for laparoscopy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction.
Minnich DJ; Schell SR
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2003 Oct; 13(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14617395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance analysis on physical simulator of four different instrument setups in laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery.
Sánchez-Margallo FM; Matos-Azevedo AM; Pérez-Duarte FJ; Enciso S; Martín-Portugués ID
Surg Endosc; 2014 May; 28(5):1479-88. PubMed ID: 24357421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance.
Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM
J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Training to acquire psychomotor skills for endoscopic endonasal surgery using a personal webcam trainer.
Hirayama R; Fujimoto Y; Umegaki M; Kagawa N; Kinoshita M; Hashimoto N; Yoshimine T
J Neurosurg; 2013 May; 118(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23330994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments.
Martinec DV; Gatta P; Zheng B; Denk PM; Swanström LL
Surg Endosc; 2009 Dec; 23(12):2697-701. PubMed ID: 19343420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific assessment of endoscopic surgical skills.
Egi H; Okajima M; Kawahara T; Yoshimitsu M; Sumitani D; Tokunaga M; Takeda H; Itamoto T; Ohdan H
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010; 19(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 20095895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer.
Eversbusch A; Grantcharov TP
Surg Endosc; 2004 Oct; 18(10):1514-8. PubMed ID: 15791380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators.
Zheng B; Verjee F; Lomax A; MacKenzie CL
Surg Endosc; 2005 Oct; 19(10):1388-95. PubMed ID: 16151682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retracting and seeking movements during laparoscopic goal-oriented movements. Is the shortest path length optimal?
Chmarra MK; Jansen FW; Grimbergen CA; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 17705078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester for bimanual tasks.
Francis NK; Hanna GB; Cuschieri A
Arch Surg; 2001 Jan; 136(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 11146774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practice does not always make perfect: need for selection curricula in modern surgical training.
Louridas M; Szasz P; Fecso AB; Zywiel MG; Lak P; Bener AB; Harris KA; Grantcharov TP
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3718-3727. PubMed ID: 28451813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]