These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20175056)

  • 1. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density estimated with 2 noncontact specular microscopes.
    Goldich Y; Marcovich AL; Barkana Y; Hartstein M; Morad Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 20175056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement of Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis Between Konan-Noncon Robo SP-6000 and Tomey EM-3000 Specular Microscopes in Healthy Subjects.
    Jbara D; Achiron A; Antman G; Buhbut O; Hecht I; Tuuminen R; Bahar I; Elbaz U
    Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Apr; 47(4):191-195. PubMed ID: 32443012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of recording systems and analysis methods in specular microscopy.
    Ohno K; Nelson LR; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 1999 Jul; 18(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 10422853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of a video-based noncontact specular microscope for assessing the corneal endothelium.
    Prinz A; Varga J; Findl O
    Cornea; 2007 Sep; 26(8):924-9. PubMed ID: 17721289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of three semiautomated specular microscopes.
    Landesz M; Siertsema JV; Van Rij G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1995 Jul; 21(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 8523285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
    de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes.
    Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell images from a noncontact specular microscope and a scanning confocal microscope.
    Kitzmann AS; Winter EJ; Nau CB; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 2005 Nov; 24(8):980-4. PubMed ID: 16227846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy.
    Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A; Módis L
    Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21598434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of manual and automated endothelial cell density analysis in normal eyes and DSEK eyes.
    Price MO; Fairchild KM; Price FW
    Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 22893099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.
    Karaca I; Yilmaz SG; Palamar M; Ates H
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 28674859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.
    Maruoka S; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Katakami C; Tabuchi H; Chikama T; Kiuchi Y
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2495-2507. PubMed ID: 29086325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S144-S150. PubMed ID: 28346276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy.
    Al Farhan HM; Al Otaibi WM; Al Razqan HM; Al Harqan AA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 13():73. PubMed ID: 24274022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 4 specular microscopes in healthy eyes and eyes with cornea guttata or corneal grafts.
    Luft N; Hirnschall N; Schuschitz S; Draschl P; Findl O
    Cornea; 2015 Apr; 34(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 25719252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal endothelial cell density and pachymetry measured by contact and noncontact specular microscopy.
    Módis L; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Oct; 28(10):1763-9. PubMed ID: 12388025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and noncontact specular microscopy in assessing corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Parisi L; Felletti M; Brusini P
    Cornea; 2011 Jul; 30(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 21150426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central and Peripheral Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis With Slit-Scanning Wide-Field Contact Specular Microscopy: Agreement With Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
    Lee J; Mori Y; Ogata M; Minami K; Miyata K
    Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1137-1141. PubMed ID: 31394553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.