299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20175368)
1. Prevalence and significance of perineural invasion in invasive breast carcinoma.
Karak SG; Quatrano N; Buckley J; Ricci A
Conn Med; 2010 Jan; 74(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20175368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical relevance of the distribution of the lesions in 500 consecutive breast cancer cases documented in large-format histologic sections.
Tot T
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 110(11):2551-60. PubMed ID: 17932896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymphovascular invasion and pT stage are prognostic factors in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.
Kim DS; Lee YH; Cho KS; Cho NH; Chung BH; Hong SJ
Urology; 2010 Feb; 75(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 20018349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perineural invasion has no prognostic value in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.
Duraker N; Caynak ZC; Türköz K
Breast; 2006 Oct; 15(5):629-34. PubMed ID: 16466917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymphovascular invasion is associated with reduced locoregional control and survival in women with node-negative breast cancer treated with mastectomy and systemic therapy.
Truong PT; Yong CM; Abnousi F; Lee J; Kader HA; Hayashi A; Olivotto IA
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jun; 200(6):912-21. PubMed ID: 15922205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognosis and management of patients with node-negative invasive breast carcinoma that is 1 cm or smaller in size (stage 1; T1a,bN0M0): a review of the literature.
Hanrahan EO; Valero V; Gonzalez-Angulo AM; Hortobagyi GN
J Clin Oncol; 2006 May; 24(13):2113-22. PubMed ID: 16648513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved methods of detection of lymphovascular invasion demonstrate that it is the predominant method of vascular invasion in breast cancer and has important clinical consequences.
Mohammed RA; Martin SG; Gill MS; Green AR; Paish EC; Ellis IO
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Dec; 31(12):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18043036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Maru N; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
Hum Pathol; 2001 Aug; 32(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 11521227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of perineural invasion in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.
Huh JW; Kim HR; Kim YJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):2066-72. PubMed ID: 20182809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion diagnosed by lymphatic endothelium immunostaining in breast cancer patients.
Tezuka K; Onoda N; Takashima T; Takagaki K; Ishikawa T; Wakasa T; Wakasa K; Hirakawa K
Oncol Rep; 2007 May; 17(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 17390035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphovascular invasion independently predicts increased disease specific survival in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.
Kikuchi E; Horiguchi Y; Nakashima J; Hatakeyama N; Matsumoto M; Nishiyama T; Murai M
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2120-3; discussion 2124. PubMed ID: 16280740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
Shariat SF; Khoddami SM; Saboorian H; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI; Cadeddu JA; McConnell JD; Holmes MN; Roehrborn CG
J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1122-7. PubMed ID: 14767284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract.
Hong B; Park S; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ro JY; Ahn H
Urology; 2005 Apr; 65(4):692-6. PubMed ID: 15833510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Invasion characteristics of oral tongue cancer: frequency of reporting and effect on survival in a population-based study.
Goodman M; Liu L; Ward K; Zhang J; Almon L; Su G; Berglund L; Chen A; Sinha UK; Young JL
Cancer; 2009 Sep; 115(17):4010-20. PubMed ID: 19551891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of lymphovascular invasion in upper urinary tract urothelial cancer.
Akao J; Matsuyama H; Yamamoto Y; Hara T; Kawai Y; Sakano S; Ohmi C; Gondo T; Naito K
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):572-5. PubMed ID: 18485032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Jeon HG; Bae J; Yi JS; Hwang IS; Lee SE; Lee E
Int J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):682-6. PubMed ID: 19602004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia II. Perineural invasion.
Leibovitch I; Huilgol SC; Selva D; Hill D; Richards S; Paver R
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 53(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 16021121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of perineural invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric carcinoma.
Duraker N; Sişman S; Can G
Surg Today; 2003; 33(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 12616368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion in stage II rectal cancer: a report from the Swedish colorectal cancer registry.
Nikberg M; Chabok A; Letocha H; Kindler C; Glimelius B; Smedh K
Acta Oncol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):1418-1424. PubMed ID: 27732105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
