191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20175484)
21. Malignant lesion segmentation in contrast-enhanced breast MR images based on the marker-controlled watershed.
Cui Y; Tan Y; Zhao B; Liberman L; Parbhu R; Kaplan J; Theodoulou M; Hudis C; Schwartz LH
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4359-69. PubMed ID: 19928066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms via a multiple-frequency inverse scattering technique.
Shea JD; Kosmas P; Hagness SC; Van Veen BD
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4210-26. PubMed ID: 20879582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Gröschel T; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S4-5. PubMed ID: 23083596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multistage processing procedure for 4D breast MRI segmentation.
Qi W; Hui D; Guang-zhi W
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3036-9. PubMed ID: 19163346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Invasive Breast Cancer Preferably and Predominantly Occurs at the Interface Between Fibroglandular and Adipose Tissue.
Zhu W; Harvey S; Macura KJ; Euhus DM; Artemov D
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):e11-e18. PubMed ID: 27568102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.
Wang J; Azziz A; Fan B; Malkov S; Klifa C; Newitt D; Yitta S; Hylton N; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81653. PubMed ID: 24324712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography.
Engelken F; Bremme R; Bick U; Hammann-Kloss S; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e844-8. PubMed ID: 22647420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 3-point Dixon imaging and fuzzy C-means clustering methods for breast density measurement.
Clendenen TV; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Moy L; Pike MC; Rusinek H; Kim S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 23292922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fully automatic lesion segmentation in breast MRI using mean-shift and graph-cuts on a region adjacency graph.
McClymont D; Mehnert A; Trakic A; Kennedy D; Crozier S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 39(4):795-804. PubMed ID: 24783238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Age- and race-dependence of the fibroglandular breast density analyzed on 3D MRI.
Nie K; Su MY; Chau MK; Chan S; Nguyen H; Tseng T; Huang Y; McLaren CE; Nalcioglu O; Chen JH
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2770-6. PubMed ID: 20632587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: clinical, pathologic, and mammographic features.
Beute BJ; Kalisher L; Hutter RV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Aug; 157(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 1853802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) correlates with the risk of breast cancer.
Telegrafo M; Rella L; Stabile Ianora AA; Angelelli G; Moschetta M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 26597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification.
Agner SC; Soman S; Libfeld E; McDonald M; Thomas K; Englander S; Rosen MA; Chin D; Nosher J; Madabhushi A
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Jun; 24(3):446-63. PubMed ID: 20508965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts.
Giuliano V; Giuliano C
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 23116728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
