These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20175486)

  • 21. Effect of tube voltage on CT noise levels in different phantom sizes.
    Karmazyn B; Liang Y; Klahr P; Jennings SG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1001-5. PubMed ID: 23617481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Achieving consistent image quality and overall radiation dose reduction for coronary CT angiography with body mass index-dependent tube voltage and tube current selection.
    Wang G; Gao J; Zhao S; Sun X; Chen X; Cui X
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Sep; 69(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 24909505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simulated dose reduction by adding artificial noise to measured raw data: a validation study.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M; Nilsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):71-7. PubMed ID: 20172933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data.
    Kordolaimi SD; Saradeas I; Ploussi A; Pantos I; Argentos S; Efstathopoulos EP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W434-9. PubMed ID: 25247973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cardiac computed tomography angiography with automatic tube potential selection: effects on radiation dose and image quality.
    Ghoshhajra BB; Engel LC; Károlyi M; Sidhu MS; Wai B; Barreto M; Shanmugam U; Hoffmann U; Brady TJ; Kalra M; Abbara S
    J Thorac Imaging; 2013 Jan; 28(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 22847638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Liver Phantom Study: CT Radiation Dose Reduction and Different Image Reconstruction Algorithms Affect Diagnostic Quality.
    Brænne KR; Flinder LI; Almenning Martiniussen M; Jensen K; Reisse CH; Julsrud L; Martinsen AC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):735-9. PubMed ID: 27224229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
    Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automatic radiation dose monitoring for CT of trauma patients with different protocols: feasibility and accuracy.
    Higashigaito K; Becker AS; Sprengel K; Simmen HP; Wanner G; Alkadhi H
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):905-11. PubMed ID: 27234434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/pelvic CT: a phantom study.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader R; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Mar; 48(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 23344519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic exposure control systems designed to maintain constant image noise: effects on computed tomography dose and noise relative to clinically accepted technique charts.
    Favazza CP; Yu L; Leng S; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 25938214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options.
    McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 16549613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Schindera ST; Graca P; Patak MA; Abderhalden S; von Allmen G; Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):650-5. PubMed ID: 19724236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
    Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography.
    Schabel C; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Wuerslin C; Thomas C; Korn A; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M; Ketelsen D
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 23099242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated Tube Voltage Selection for Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Angiography Using Different Contrast Media Concentrations and a Constant Iodine Delivery Rate.
    Kok M; Mihl C; Seehofnerová A; Turek J; Jost G; Pietsch H; Haberland U; Wildberger JE; Das M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1332-8. PubMed ID: 26587942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.
    Larson DB; Wang LL; Podberesky DJ; Goske MJ
    Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 23784878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise-based tube current reduction method with iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography.
    Shen J; Du X; Guo D; Cao L; Gao Y; Bai M; Li P; Liu J; Li K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):349-55. PubMed ID: 23140592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.