These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20175489)

  • 41. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Towards tracer dose reduction in PET studies: Simulation of dose reduction by retrospective randomized undersampling of list-mode data.
    Gatidis S; Würslin C; Seith F; Schäfer JF; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 26929936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Simulation of lung nodules in chest tomosynthesis.
    Svalkvist A; Håkansson M; Ullman G; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):130-9. PubMed ID: 20093269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data.
    Kordolaimi SD; Saradeas I; Ploussi A; Pantos I; Argentos S; Efstathopoulos EP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W434-9. PubMed ID: 25247973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Exact calculation of the minimal exposure for the secure detection of a transmission contrast signal.
    Schöfer FH; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):81-5. PubMed ID: 20185455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE QUALITY AND PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL PAEDIATRIC RADIOGRAPHY.
    Menser B; Manke D; Mentrup D; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):371-7. PubMed ID: 26628612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning digital mammography system for tomosynthesis.
    Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Douglas TS
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 27002901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simulation of 3D objects into breast tomosynthesis images.
    Shaheen E; Zanca F; Sisini F; Zhang G; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):108-12. PubMed ID: 20207750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A retrospective study of chest tomosynthesis as a tool for optimizing the use of computed tomography resources and reducing patient radiation exposure.
    Johnsson ÅA; Vikgren J; Båth M
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1427-33. PubMed ID: 25097012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spectral analysis of mammographic images using a multitaper method.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):801-10. PubMed ID: 22320790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kordolaimi SD; Argentos S; Pantos I; Kelekis NL; Efstathopoulos EP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 24270114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetry of chest tomosynthesis.
    Svalkvist A; Månsson LG; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):144-52. PubMed ID: 20200101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantifying the tibiofemoral joint space using x-ray tomosynthesis.
    Kalinosky B; Sabol JM; Piacsek K; Heckel B; Gilat Schmidt T
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6672-82. PubMed ID: 22149849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Inverse determination of the penalty parameter in penalized weighted least-squares algorithm for noise reduction of low-dose CBCT.
    Wang J; Guan H; Solberg T
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4066-72. PubMed ID: 21859005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose.
    Kolditz D; Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2719-30. PubMed ID: 20632582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
    Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A phantom study showing the importance of compression in conventional diagnostic X-ray examinations.
    Olsson ML; Tingberg A; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):78-80. PubMed ID: 20207751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.