These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20175501)

  • 1. Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms.
    Wu YT; Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Daly CP; Douglas JA; Zhang Y; Sahiner B; Shi J; Wei J
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 20175501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.
    Zhou C; Wei J; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Douglas JA
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2289-99. PubMed ID: 20527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
    Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.
    Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system.
    Tanaka T; Nitta N; Ohta S; Kobayashi T; Kano A; Tsuchiya K; Murakami Y; Kitahara S; Wakamiya M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Dec; 19(12):2886-95. PubMed ID: 19585121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
    Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided mass detection on digitized mammograms using adaptive thresholding and fuzzy entropy.
    Younesi F; Alam N; Zoroofi RA; Ahmadian A; Guiti M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5638-41. PubMed ID: 18003291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
    Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.
    Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20619697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A heuristic approach to automated nipple detection in digital mammograms.
    Jas M; Mukhopadhyay S; Chakraborty J; Sadhu A; Khandelwal N
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):932-40. PubMed ID: 23423610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation and comparison of the performance of state of the art approaches for the detection of spiculated masses in mammograms.
    Kage A; Elter M; Wittenberg T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3773-6. PubMed ID: 18002819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
    Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.