197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20175681)
1. Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.
Tosini W; Ciotti C; Goyer F; Lolom I; L'Hériteau F; Abiteboul D; Pellissier G; Bouvet E
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 31(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20175681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals.
Lamontagne F; Abiteboul D; Lolom I; Pellissier G; Tarantola A; Descamps JM; Bouvet E
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 17230383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.
Fukuda H; Yamanaka N
J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26601603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.
Ottino MC; Argentero A; Argentero PA; Garzaro G; Zotti CM
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030576. PubMed ID: 31748292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?
Schuurmans J; Lutgens SP; Groen L; Schneeberger PM
J Hosp Infect; 2018 Sep; 100(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29738783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.
Dulon M; Stranzinger J; Wendeler D; Nienhaus A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33255337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic benefits of safety-engineered sharp devices in Belgium - a budget impact model.
Hanmore E; Maclaine G; Garin F; Alonso A; Leroy N; Ruff L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Nov; 13():489. PubMed ID: 24274747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
Reddy VK; Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD009740. PubMed ID: 29190036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Needlestick and sharps injuries in a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea.
Park S; Jeong I; Huh J; Yoon Y; Lee S; Choi C
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Aug; 36(6):439-43. PubMed ID: 18675151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causes of needlestick injuries in three healthcare settings: analysis of accident notifications registered six months after the implementation of EU Directive 2010/32/EU in Germany.
Dulon M; Lisiak B; Wendeler D; Nienhaus A
J Hosp Infect; 2017 Mar; 95(3):306-311. PubMed ID: 28034473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Device-specific rates of needlestick injury at a large military teaching hospital.
Nevin RL; Carbonell I; Thurmond V
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):750-2. PubMed ID: 18834746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles.
Whitby M; McLaws ML; Slater K
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Apr; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 18371513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD009740. PubMed ID: 24610008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Needlestick injuries: the role of safety-engineered devices in prevention.
Jackson AP; Almerol LA; Campbell J; Hamilton L
Br J Nurs; 2020 Jul; 29(14):S22-S30. PubMed ID: 32697642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.
Ippolito G; De Carli G; Puro V; Petrosillo N; Arici C; Bertucci R; Bianciardi L; Bonazzi L; Cestrone A; Daglio M
JAMA; 1994 Aug 24-31; 272(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 8057516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of safety needle devices on occupationally acquired needlestick injuries: a four-year prospective study.
Adams D; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2006 Sep; 64(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 16822584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elimination of Lancet-Related Needlestick Injuries Using a Safety-Engineered Lancet: Experience in a Hospital.
An HS; Ko S; Bang JH; Park SW
Infect Chemother; 2018 Dec; 50(4):319-327. PubMed ID: 30600655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Needlestick injuries in European nurses in diabetes.
Costigliola V; Frid A; Letondeur C; Strauss K
Diabetes Metab; 2012 Jan; 38 Suppl 1():S9-14. PubMed ID: 22305441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Safety-Engineered Devices.
Fukuda H; Moriwaki K
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 27226284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of a safety-engineered device to prevent needlestick injury: why has not StatLock stuck?
Griswold S; Bonaroti A; Rieder CJ; Erbayri J; Parsons J; Nocera R; Hamilton R
BMJ Open; 2013; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 23616435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
