These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20176361)

  • 21. A comparative mechanical and bone remodelling study of all-ceramic posterior inlay and onlay fixed partial dentures.
    Field C; Li Q; Li W; Thompson M; Swain M
    J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22019798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Flexural and creep properties of human jaw compact bone for FEA studies.
    Vitins V; Dobelis M; Middleton J; Limbert G; Knets I
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003; 6(5-6):299-303. PubMed ID: 14675950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.
    Merema BBJ; Kraeima J; Glas HH; Spijkervet FKL; Witjes MJH
    Oral Dis; 2021 Jan; 27(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 32372548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; Sterk JC; van Keulen F; Kaptein BL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 15116900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite-element analysis of 3 situations of trauma in the human edentulous mandible.
    Santos LS; Rossi AC; Freire AR; Matoso RI; Caria PH; Prado FB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 25577458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Probabilistic finite element analysis of a craniofacial finite element model.
    Berthaume MA; Dechow PC; Iriarte-Diaz J; Ross CF; Strait DS; Wang Q; Grosse IR
    J Theor Biol; 2012 May; 300():242-53. PubMed ID: 22306513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. II. Variables affecting the predictive behavior of a finite element model of a human mandible.
    Al-Sukhun J; Lindqvist C; Helenius M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 17078047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible.
    Korioth TW; Romilly DP; Hannam AG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 May; 88(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 1510115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Theoretical efficacy of preventive measures for pathologic fracture after surgical removal of mandibular lesions based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Murakami K; Yamamoto K; Tsuyuki M; Sugiura T; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):833.e1-18. PubMed ID: 24635857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-dimensional modelling and finite element analysis of the human mandible during clenching.
    Choi AH; Ben-Nissan B; Conway RC
    Aust Dent J; 2005 Mar; 50(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 15881305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
    Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanics and functional distortion of the human mandible.
    Choi AH; Conway RC; Taraschi V; Ben-Nissan B
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 Nov; 6(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 25044432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does the model reflect the system? When two-dimensional biomechanics is not 'good enough'.
    Smith AL; Davis J; Panagiotopoulou O; Taylor AB; Robinson C; Ward CV; Kimbel WH; Alemseged Z; Ross CF
    J R Soc Interface; 2023 Jan; 20(198):20220536. PubMed ID: 36695017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies.
    Anderson AE; Peters CL; Tuttle BD; Weiss JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 16060343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanobiological bone reaction quantified by positron emission tomography.
    Suenaga H; Chen J; Yamaguchi K; Li W; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q
    J Dent Res; 2015 May; 94(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 25710952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.
    Geng JP; Xu DW; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15453222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A method for material parameter determination for the human mandible based on simulation and experiment.
    Clason C; Hinz AM; Schieferstein H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Oct; 7(5):265-76. PubMed ID: 15621649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Allometry in the distribution of material properties and geometry of the felid skull: why larger species may need to change and how they may achieve it.
    Chamoli U; Wroe S
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Aug; 283(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 21651916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
    Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stress and strain in the mandibular symphysis of primates: a test of competing hypotheses.
    Hylander WL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1984 May; 64(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 6731608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.