These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20176664)

  • 1. Genetic screening: a conceptual framework for programmes and policy-making.
    Andermann A; Blancquaert I; Déry V
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2010 Apr; 15(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 20176664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guiding policy decisions for genetic screening: developing a systematic and transparent approach.
    Andermann A; Blancquaert I; Beauchamp S; Costea I
    Public Health Genomics; 2011; 14(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 20051674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obesity prevention: a proposed framework for translating evidence into action.
    Swinburn B; Gill T; Kumanyika S
    Obes Rev; 2005 Feb; 6(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 15655036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using social network analysis to examine the decision-making process on new vaccine introduction in Nigeria.
    Wonodi CB; Privor-Dumm L; Aina M; Pate AM; Reis R; Gadhoke P; Levine OS
    Health Policy Plan; 2012 May; 27 Suppl 2():ii27-38. PubMed ID: 22513730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations.
    Dobrow MJ; Goel V; Lemieux-Charles L; Black NA
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Oct; 63(7):1811-24. PubMed ID: 16764980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based policy-making: the implications of globally-applicable research for context-specific problem-solving in developing countries.
    Behague D; Tawiah C; Rosato M; Some T; Morrison J
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Nov; 69(10):1539-46. PubMed ID: 19781839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European micronutrient recommendations aligned: a general framework developed by EURRECA.
    Dhonukshe-Rutten RA; Timotijevic L; Cavelaars AE; Raats MM; de Wit LS; Doets EL; Tabacchi G; Roman B; Ngo-de la Cruz J; Gurinovic M; de Groot LC; van 't Veer P
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2010 Jun; 64 Suppl 2():S2-10. PubMed ID: 20517317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process.
    Ross S; Lavis J; Rodriguez C; Woodside J; Denis JL
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Oct; 8 Suppl 2():26-34. PubMed ID: 14596745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process.
    Exworthy M
    Health Policy Plan; 2008 Sep; 23(5):318-27. PubMed ID: 18701553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Healthy public policy A conceptual cognitive framework.
    Gagnon F; Turgeon J; Dallaire C
    Health Policy; 2007 Apr; 81(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 16793169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health impact assessment of agriculture and food policies: lessons learnt from the Republic of Slovenia.
    Lock K; Gabrijelcic-Blenkus M; Martuzzi M; Otorepec P; Wallace P; Dora C; Robertson A; Zakotnic JM
    Bull World Health Organ; 2003; 81(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 12894321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A conceptual framework for genetic policy: comparing the medical, public health, and fundamental rights models.
    Andrews LB
    Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(152):221-85. PubMed ID: 16211786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of surveillance and data use in the development of public health policies.
    Stachenko S
    Promot Educ; 2008 Sep; 15(3):27-9. PubMed ID: 18784050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The conceptual framework for decision making data elements in public health].
    Wang HJ; Jin SG; Liu LH
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 41(5):348-52. PubMed ID: 18206002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population genetic screening programmes: principles, techniques, practices, and policies.
    Godard B; ten Kate L; Evers-Kiebooms G; Aymé S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2003 Dec; 11 Suppl 2():S49-87. PubMed ID: 14718938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do drug policy makers access research evidence?
    Ritter A
    Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Jan; 20(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 18226519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for reasonableness: Exploring the personal internal framework affecting decisions about cancer drug funding.
    Sinclair S; Hagen NA; Chambers C; Manns B; Simon A; Browman GP
    Health Policy; 2008 May; 86(2-3):381-90. PubMed ID: 18243395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Navigating tissue banking regulation: conceptual frameworks for researchers, administrators, regulators and policy-makers.
    Lipworth W
    J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 16304764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.