These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20176730)

  • 41. Dosimetry of clinical neutron and proton beams: an overview of recommendations.
    Vynckier S; ;
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):565-72. PubMed ID: 15353710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the calibration procedure of active personal dosemeters for interventional radiology.
    Bordy JM; Daures J; Clairand I; Denozière M; Donadille L; d'Errico F; Gouriou J; Itié C; Struelens L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 18757898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Field calibration studies for ionisation chambers in mixed high-energy radiation fields.
    Theis C; Forkel-Wirth D; Fuerstner M; Mayer S; Otto T; Roesler S; Vincke H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):299-305. PubMed ID: 17522038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Conversion coefficients from absorbed dose to tissue to the newly proposed ICRU/ICRP operational quantities for radiation protection for beta reference radiation qualities.
    Behrens R
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Nov; 41(4):. PubMed ID: 33873160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Establishment of radiation qualities for mammography according to the IEC 61267 and TRS 457.
    Pires EJ; David MG; Peixoto JG; Dealmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Apr; 145(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21062803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the effects of scattered radiation on dosimeter calibration in a calibration range.
    Petrie CM; Nimps RG; Blue TE; Herminghuysen K
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 23192089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Slănic-Prahova low background calibration facility.
    Celarel A; Duliu OG; Bercea S; Cenusa C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Mar; 168(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 26001826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Shield placement: effect on exposure.
    Culp MP; Barba JR; Jackowski MB
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(4):369-76. PubMed ID: 24614433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. THE IN-SITU CALIBRATION METHOD FOR AMBIENT DOSE EQUIVALENT DOSEMETERS.
    Gao F; Wang F; Xu Y; Zhang X
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Nov; 196(1-2):85-94. PubMed ID: 34492113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. ESTIMATION OF PERSONAL DOSE EQUIVALENT HP(0.07) USING CASO4:DY TEFLON DISC-BASED EXTREMITY DOSEMETER.
    Bhattacharya M; Samuel K; Patil S; Yadav R; Bakshi AK; Singh SK; Sapra BK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Dec; 198(20):1546-1556. PubMed ID: 36244338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Automated Patient-Specific Dose Registries, or Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Software: Why They Are a Very Good Idea!
    MacGregor K; Dowdell T; Gray B
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2015 Nov; 66(4):394. PubMed ID: 26601929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Choice of the measuring quantity for therapy-level dosemeters.
    Reich H
    Phys Med Biol; 1979 Sep; 24(5):895-900. PubMed ID: 515176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Exposure dose and personal dosimeter].
    Matsumoto S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jul; 69(7):795-805. PubMed ID: 23877159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The present status of calibrations of ionization dosemeters with high-voltage x-rays.
    AXTON EJ; BARNARD GP; BELCHER DS; MARSH AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1956 Jul; 1(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 13378999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Calibration of dosimetric films with beta particles of various maximum energies].
    Metalli P; Lesaca RM; Mc Cannon D
    Minerva Fisiconucl; 1968; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 5718828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On the effect of variations in the ambient air on the calibration and use of ionization dosemeters.
    BARNARD GP; ASTON GH; MARSH AR
    Br J Radiol; 1960 Oct; 33():644-5. PubMed ID: 13687081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comments regarding "Calibration of Safecast dose rate measurements" by Cervone and Hultquist.
    Brown A; Moross J; Franken P; Bonner S
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Feb; 197():127-128. PubMed ID: 30470483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A note on the calibration of x-ray dosemeters.
    TOOZE J; WORTHLEY B
    Phys Med Biol; 1959 Jul; 4():30-2. PubMed ID: 13838844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of variations in the ambient air on the calibration and use of ionization dosemeters.
    BARNARD GP; ASTON GH; MARSH AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1960 Oct; 5():117-8. PubMed ID: 13687082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Phantom Evolution.
    Harrison JD
    Ann ICRP; 2020 Oct; 49(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 33231096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.