116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20176733)
21. Validation of fast-RAMLA in clinical PET.
Sato H; Cho K; Fukushima Y; Shiiba M; Hakozaki K; Kiriyama T; Sakurai M; Kanaya K; Kumita S
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Dec; 22(10):869-76. PubMed ID: 19142705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values.
Jaskowiak CJ; Bianco JA; Perlman SB; Fine JP
J Nucl Med; 2005 Mar; 46(3):424-8. PubMed ID: 15750154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accelerated EM reconstruction in total-body PET: potential for improving tumour detectability.
Meikle SR; Hutton BF; Bailey DL; Hooper PK; Fulham MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1689-704. PubMed ID: 15551539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts.
Beyer T; Bockisch A; Kühl H; Martinez MJ
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16391192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interpolated average CT for attenuation correction in PET--a simulation study.
Mok GS; Sun T; Huang TC; Vai MI
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1927-34. PubMed ID: 23392338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Image derived input functions for dynamic High Resolution Research Tomograph PET brain studies.
Mourik JE; van Velden FH; Lubberink M; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Neuroimage; 2008 Dec; 43(4):676-86. PubMed ID: 18707007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improvement of semi-quantitative small-animal PET data with recovery coefficients: a phantom and rat study.
Aide N; Louis MH; Dutoit S; Labiche A; Lemoisson E; Briand M; Nataf V; Poulain L; Gauduchon P; Talbot JN; Montravers F
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Oct; 28(10):813-22. PubMed ID: 17728612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Super-resolution in PET imaging.
Kennedy JA; Israel O; Frenkel A; Bar-Shalom R; Azhari H
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16468448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Annihilation photon acollinearity in PET: volunteer and phantom FDG studies.
Shibuya K; Yoshida E; Nishikido F; Suzuki T; Tsuda T; Inadama N; Yamaya T; Murayama H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5249-61. PubMed ID: 17762084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies.
Reilhac A; Tomeï S; Buvat I; Michel C; Keheren F; Costes N
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):359-68. PubMed ID: 17920931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Appropriately regularized OSEM can improve the reconstructed PET images of data with low count statistics.
Karaoglanis K; Polycarpou I; Efthimiou N; Tsoumpas C
Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 26187214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of a generic thresholding algorithm for the delineation of 18FDG-PET-positive tissue: application to the comparison of three thresholding models.
Vauclin S; Doyeux K; Hapdey S; Edet-Sanson A; Vera P; Gardin I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):6901-16. PubMed ID: 19864698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Phantom studies and clinical application of high resolution, image reconstruction using (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT for prostate cancer.
Zielinski A; Behrendt FF; Verburg FA; Mottaghy FM; Krohn T
Hell J Nucl Med; 2014; 17(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 25397625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Denoising of PET images by combining wavelets and curvelets for improved preservation of resolution and quantitation.
Le Pogam A; Hanzouli H; Hatt M; Cheze Le Rest C; Visvikis D
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):877-91. PubMed ID: 23837964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy.
Baete K; Nuyts J; Van Paesschen W; Suetens P; Dupont P
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Apr; 23(4):510-9. PubMed ID: 15084076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Segmentation of heterogeneous or small FDG PET positive tissue based on a 3D-locally adaptive random walk algorithm.
Onoma DP; Ruan S; Thureau S; Nkhali L; Modzelewski R; Monnehan GA; Vera P; Gardin I
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Dec; 38(8):753-63. PubMed ID: 25450759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for
Matheoud R; Lecchi M; Lizio D; Scabbio C; Marcassa C; Leva L; Del Sole A; Rodella C; Indovina L; Bracco C; Brambilla M; Zoccarato O
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 26758376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Supersampling in PET. A concept for improvement of the resolution of positron emission tomography.
Assentoft JE; Thomsen JS; Andreasen A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3622-5. PubMed ID: 21096846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
