152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20176962)
1. The value of spatial information in MPA network design.
Costello C; Rassweiler A; Siegel D; De Leo G; Micheli F; Rosenberg A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18294-9. PubMed ID: 20176962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marine protected areas and the value of spatially optimized fishery management.
Rassweiler A; Costello C; Siegel DA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(29):11884-9. PubMed ID: 22753469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features.
Edgar GJ; Stuart-Smith RD; Willis TJ; Kininmonth S; Baker SC; Banks S; Barrett NS; Becerro MA; Bernard AT; Berkhout J; Buxton CD; Campbell SJ; Cooper AT; Davey M; Edgar SC; Försterra G; Galván DE; Irigoyen AJ; Kushner DJ; Moura R; Parnell PE; Shears NT; Soler G; Strain EM; Thomson RJ
Nature; 2014 Feb; 506(7487):216-20. PubMed ID: 24499817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marine protected area networks in California, USA.
Botsford LW; White JW; Carr MH; Caselle JE
Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():205-51. PubMed ID: 25358301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the effect of the spatial scale of fishery management.
Takashina N; Baskett ML
J Theor Biol; 2016 Feb; 390():14-22. PubMed ID: 26593243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.
Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C
Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tracking the response of industrial fishing fleets to large marine protected areas in the Pacific Ocean.
White TD; Ong T; Ferretti F; Block BA; McCauley DJ; Micheli F; De Leo GA
Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1571-1578. PubMed ID: 33031635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses.
White C; Halpern BS; Kappel CV
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(12):4696-701. PubMed ID: 22392996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of pre-closure fishing effort on marine protected area performance in social-ecological dimensions: Implications for developing marine conservation plans.
Li Y; Sun M; Ren Y; Chen Y
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 729():138936. PubMed ID: 32361451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The good, the bad and the ugly of marine reserves for fishery yields.
De Leo GA; Micheli F
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 370(1681):. PubMed ID: 26460129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High resolution assessment of commercial fisheries activity along the US West Coast using Vessel Monitoring System data with a case study using California groundfish fisheries.
Wang YH; Ruttenberg BI; Walter RK; Pendleton F; Samhouri JF; Liu OR; White C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0298868. PubMed ID: 38843128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Five key attributes can increase marine protected areas performance for small-scale fisheries management.
Di Franco A; Thiriet P; Di Carlo G; Dimitriadis C; Francour P; Gutiérrez NL; Jeudy de Grissac A; Koutsoubas D; Milazzo M; Otero MD; Piante C; Plass-Johnson J; Sainz-Trapaga S; Santarossa L; Tudela S; Guidetti P
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38135. PubMed ID: 27905533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The historical development of complex global trafficking networks for marine wildlife.
Miller EA; McClenachan L; Uni Y; Phocas G; Hagemann ME; Van Houtan KS
Sci Adv; 2019 Mar; 5(3):eaav5948. PubMed ID: 30957017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status.
White JW; Botsford LW; Moffitt EA; Fischer DT
Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1523-41. PubMed ID: 20945757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Communicating marine reserve science to diverse audiences.
Grorud-Colvert K; Lester SE; Airamé S; Neeley E; Gaines SD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18306-11. PubMed ID: 20427745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The worldwide costs of marine protected areas.
Balmford A; Gravestock P; Hockley N; McClean CJ; Roberts CM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Jun; 101(26):9694-7. PubMed ID: 15205483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Designing MPAs for food security in open-access fisheries.
Cabral RB; Halpern BS; Lester SE; White C; Gaines SD; Costello C
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8033. PubMed ID: 31142773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
