BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20177093)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
    Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
    Cott Chubiz JE; Lee JM; Gilmore ME; Kong CY; Lowry KP; Halpern EF; McMahon PM; Ryan PD; Gazelle GS
    Cancer; 2013 Mar; 119(6):1266-76. PubMed ID: 23184400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
    Pataky R; Armstrong L; Chia S; Coldman AJ; Kim-Sing C; McGillivray B; Scott J; Wilson CM; Peacock S
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23837641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers: effectiveness of MR imaging--Markov Monte Carlo decision analysis.
    Lee JM; Kopans DB; McMahon PM; Halpern EF; Ryan PD; Weinstein MC; Gazelle GS
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):763-71. PubMed ID: 18309013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
    Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.
    Griebsch I; Brown J; Boggis C; Dixon A; Dixon M; Easton D; Eeles R; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Hawnaur J; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Potterton J; Thompson D; Turnbull LW; Walker LG; Warren R; Leach MO;
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Oct; 95(7):801-10. PubMed ID: 17016484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
    Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.
    Tosteson AN; Stout NK; Fryback DG; Acharyya S; Herman BA; Hannah LG; Pisano ED;
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 Jan; 148(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18166758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a Stratified National Breast Screening Program in the United Kingdom: An Early Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Gray E; Donten A; Karssemeijer N; van Gils C; Evans DG; Astley S; Payne K
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1100-1109. PubMed ID: 28964442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
    Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers.
    Grann VR; Patel PR; Jacobson JS; Warner E; Heitjan DF; Ashby-Thompson M; Hershman DL; Neugut AI
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 125(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 20644999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high-risk women.
    Taneja C; Edelsberg J; Weycker D; Guo A; Oster G; Weinreb J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Mar; 6(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 19248993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
    Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
    J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.