These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20177978)

  • 1. Quality control of ultrasound transducers: analysis of evaluation parameters and results of a survey of 116 transducers in a single hospital.
    Cozzolino P; Stramare R; Udilano A; Castoro M; Scagliori E; Beltrame V; Rubaltelli L
    Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):668-77. PubMed ID: 20177978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program.
    Hangiandreou NJ; Stekel SF; Tradup DJ; Gorny KR; King DM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1350-7. PubMed ID: 21683511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and implementation of a quality control protocol for B-mode ultrasound equipment.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Triantopoulou SS; Triantopoulou C
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Jun; 25(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 33834366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.
    Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 29322614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing.
    Fabiszewska E; Pasicz K; Grabska I; Skrzyński W; Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk W; Bulski W
    Pol J Radiol; 2017; 82():773-782. PubMed ID: 29657644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality assurance of high resolution, real time, ultrasound equipment.
    Brough P
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Jan; 56(632):16-7. PubMed ID: 2182047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound grayscale image quality comparison between a 2D intracavitary transducer and a 3D intracavitary transducer used in 2D mode: A phantom study.
    Zhou W; Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Browne JE; Brown DL; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):134-140. PubMed ID: 31002482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Key performance parameters of a contemporary diagnostic ultrasound transducer.
    Moore GW
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2010; 44(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 20715353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple uniformity test for ultrasound phased arrays.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1162-6. PubMed ID: 27546869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality control in breast ultrasound.
    Lagalla R; Midiri M
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 2():S229-33. PubMed ID: 9652527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 1-3 piezoelectric composite transducers for swept-frequency calibration of hydrophones from 100 kHz to 2 MHz.
    Harris GR; Gammell PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):2914-8. PubMed ID: 15237815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.
    Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Gorny KR; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 29336119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phantom-based quality assurance measurements in B-mode ultrasound.
    Mannila V; Sipilä O
    Acta Radiol Short Rep; 2013; 2(8):2047981613511967. PubMed ID: 24349715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound transducer function: annual testing is not sufficient.
    Mårtensson M; Olsson M; Brodin LÅ
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Oct; 11(9):801-5. PubMed ID: 20530601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a low-cost liquid ultrasound test object for detection of transducer artefacts.
    King DM; Hangiandreou NJ; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):N557-70. PubMed ID: 21081828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Phantom studies of ultrasound equipment for quality improvement in breast diagnosis].
    Madjar H; Mundinger A; Lattermann U; Gufler H; Prömpeler HJ
    Ultraschall Med; 1996 Apr; 17(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 8685700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging?
    Oralkan O; Ergun AS; Johnson JA; Karaman M; Demirci U; Kaviani K; Lee TH; Khuri-Yakub BT
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1596-610. PubMed ID: 12484483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Method of Correcting for the Effect of Temperature on Low-Contrast Penetration Measurement in Urethane Phantoms.
    Peake E; Warrington S; Dudley NJ; Morgan PS; Gibson NM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1483-1488. PubMed ID: 30967319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.