191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20177983)
1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary pathology.
Palmucci S; Mauro LA; La Scola S; Incarbone S; Bonanno G; Milone P; Russo A; Ettorre GC
Radiol Med; 2010 Aug; 115(5):732-46. PubMed ID: 20177983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Suzuki M; Sekino Y; Hosono K; Yamamoto K; Kawana K; Nagase H; Kubota K; Nakajima A
Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 34784076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography/magnetic resonance splenoportovenography and endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of portal cavernoma cholangiopathy.
Rai GP; Nijhawan S; Madhu MP; Sharma SS; Pokharna R
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2015 Nov; 34(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 26743101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
Pungpapong S; Wallace MB; Woodward TA; Noh KW; Raimondo M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17198070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early detection of extrahepatic bile-duct carcinomas in the nonicteric stage by using MRCP followed by EUS.
Sai JK; Suyama M; Kubokawa Y; Watanabe S; Maehara T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jul; 70(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 19286177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography.
Materne R; Van Beers BE; Gigot JF; Jamart J; Geubel A; Pringot J; Deprez P
Endoscopy; 2000 Jan; 32(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10691265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Idiopathic acute pancreatitis-A myth or reality? Role of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in its diagnosis.
Mitra T; Dixit VK; Yadav DP; Shukla SK; Verma A; Thakur P; Thakur R
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 40(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33548019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using new negative per-oral contrast agent based on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for extrahepatic biliary duct visualization in liver cirrhosis.
Polakova K; Mocikova I; Purova D; Tucek P; Novak P; Novotna K; Izak N; Bielik R; Zboril R; Miroslav H
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2016 Dec; 160(4):512-517. PubMed ID: 27641140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction.
Tozzi di Angelo I; Prochazka V; Holinka M; Zapletalova J
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2011 Dec; 155(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 22336646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results.
DeWitt J; Misra VL; Leblanc JK; McHenry L; Sherman S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 16923477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes.
Malik S; Kaushik N; Khalid A; Bauer K; Brody D; Slivka A; McGrath K
Dig Dis Sci; 2007 Feb; 52(2):508-12. PubMed ID: 17211694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Versus the Gold Standard Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Detecting Common Bile Duct Stones.
Anwer M; Asghar MS; Rahman S; Kadir S; Yasmin F; Mohsin D; Jawed R; Memon GM; Rasheed U; Hassan M
Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12162. PubMed ID: 33489574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology.
Mariani A; Arcidiacono PG; Curioni S; Giussani A; Testoni PA
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 Oct; 41(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 19278909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the etiological diagnosis of "idiopathic" acute pancreatitis.
Ortega AR; Gómez-Rodríguez R; Romero M; Fernández-Zapardiel S; Céspedes Mdel M; Carrobles JM
Pancreas; 2011 Mar; 40(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21206330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Respiratory variation of the extrahepatic bile duct: evaluation with deep inspiratory and expiratory MRCP.
Ito K; Shimizu A; Tanabe M; Matsunaga N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 30(4):579-82. PubMed ID: 22387023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.
Polistina FA; Frego M; Bisello M; Manzi E; Vardanega A; Perin B
World J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 7(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25918584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Lee MG; Lee HJ; Kim MH; Kang EM; Kim YH; Lee SG; Kim PN; Ha HK; Auh YH
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):663-9. PubMed ID: 9051013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective pilot study: can the biliary tree be visualized in children younger than 3 months on Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography?
Siles P; Aschero A; Gorincour G; Bourliere-Najean B; Roquelaure B; Delarue A; Petit P
Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Sep; 44(9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 24710862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
