181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20177985)
21. Transperineal versus hydrogen peroxide-enhanced endoanal ultrasonography in never operated and recurrent cryptogenic fistula-in-ano: a pilot study.
Zbar AP; Oyetunji RO; Gill R
Tech Coloproctol; 2006 Dec; 10(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 17115320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of contrast-enhanced with non-contrast endosonography in the diagnostics of anal fistulas.
Sudol-Szopinska I; Szczepkowski M; Panorska AK; Szopiński T; Jakubowski W
Eur Radiol; 2004 Dec; 14(12):2236-41. PubMed ID: 15300394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic value of endoanal ultrasound for fistula-in-ano: a retrospective analysis.
Weisman N; Abbas MA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jul; 51(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 18461397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of endosonography in evaluation of anal fistulae and abscesses.
Sudoł-Szopińska I; Geśla J; Jakubowski W; Noszczyk W; Szczepkowsi M; Sarti D
Acta Radiol; 2002 Nov; 43(6):599-602. PubMed ID: 12485258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is accurate and reproducible in determining type and height of anal fistulas.
Kołodziejczak M; Santoro GA; Obcowska A; Lorenc Z; Mańczak M; Sudoł-Szopińska I
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 19(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 27943527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Value of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography for anal fistula assessment].
Wang Y; Ding J; Zhao K; Ye H; Zhao Y; Zhao Y; Lei Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 17(12):1183-6. PubMed ID: 25529948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultrasound study of anal fistulas with hydrogen peroxide enhancement.
Navarro-Luna A; García-Domingo MI; Rius-Macías J; Marco-Molina C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 14719157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Imaging of anal fistulas: comparison of computed tomographic fistulography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Liang C; Lu Y; Zhao B; Du Y; Wang C; Jiang W
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(6):712-23. PubMed ID: 25469082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT imaging with fistulography for perianal fistula: does it really help the surgeon?
Liang C; Jiang W; Zhao B; Zhang Y; Du Y; Lu Y
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(6):1069-76. PubMed ID: 23958432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Is it useful?
Kuijpers HC; Schulpen T
Dis Colon Rectum; 1985 Feb; 28(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 3971802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of accuracy of physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography for preoperative assessment in patients with acute and chronic anal fistula.
Toyonaga T; Tanaka Y; Song JF; Katori R; Sogawa N; Kanyama H; Hatakeyama T; Matsushima M; Suzuki S; Mibu R; Tanaka M
Tech Coloproctol; 2008 Sep; 12(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 18679573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of anal fistulas with high-resolution subtraction MR-fistulography: comparison with surgical findings.
Schaefer O; Lohrmann C; Langer M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 19(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 14696225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with perianal fistulas: comparison with 3D-anal ultrasound.
Felt-Bersma RJF; Vlietstra MS; Vollebregt PF; Han-Geurts IJM; Rempe-Sorm V; Vander Mijnsbrugge GJH; Molenaar CBH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Apr; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29618340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Value of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound scan (3D-EAUS) in preoperative assessment of fistula-in-ano.
Almeida IS; Jayarajah U; Wickramasinghe DP; Samarasekera DN
BMC Res Notes; 2019 Jan; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 30696490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The comparison of CT fistulography and MR imaging of perianal fistulae with surgical findings: a case-control study.
Soker G; Gulek B; Yilmaz C; Kaya O; Arslan M; Dilek O; Gorur M; Kuscu F; İrkorucu O
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Aug; 41(8):1474-83. PubMed ID: 27034072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of preoperative endoanal ultrasonography with intraoperative findings for fistula in ano.
Subasinghe D; Samarasekera DN
World J Surg; 2010 May; 34(5):1123-7. PubMed ID: 20174805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of endoanal ultrasound in patients with rectovaginal fistulas.
Yee LF; Birnbaum EH; Read TE; Kodner IJ; Fleshman JW
Dis Colon Rectum; 1999 Aug; 42(8):1057-64. PubMed ID: 10458131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound for Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Li J; Chen SN; Lin YY; Zhu ZM; Ye DL; Chen F; Qiu SD
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2021 Nov; 32(11):913-922. PubMed ID: 34872892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The accuracy of a postprocessing technique--volume render mode--in three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography of anal abscesses and fistulas.
Sudoł-Szopińska I; Kołodziejczak M; Szopiński TR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Feb; 54(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21228675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Peroxide-enhanced anal endosonography: technique, image interpretation, and clinical applications.
Kruskal JB; Kane RA; Morrin MM
Radiographics; 2001 Oct; 21 Spec No():S173-89. PubMed ID: 11598256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
