BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20177988)

  • 1. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Carrafiello G; Dizonno M; Colli V; Strocchi S; Pozzi Taubert S; Leonardi A; Giorgianni A; Barresi M; Macchi A; Bracchi E; Conte L; Fugazzola C
    Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):600-11. PubMed ID: 20177988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
    Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT.
    Nardi C; Talamonti C; Pallotta S; Saletti P; Calistri L; Cordopatri C; Colagrande S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170030. PubMed ID: 28511564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography--an in-vitro investigation.
    Hofmann E; Schmid M; Sedlmair M; Banckwitz R; Hirschfelder U; Lell M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):301-11. PubMed ID: 23460022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
    Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging.
    De Cock J; Zanca F; Canning J; Pauwels R; Hermans R
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1891-900. PubMed ID: 25773935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
    Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
    Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients.
    Faccioli N; Barillari M; Guariglia S; Zivelonghi E; Rizzotti A; Cerini R; Mucelli RP
    Radiol Med; 2009 Dec; 114(8):1308-18. PubMed ID: 19789956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters.
    Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 23825221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region.
    Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Ludlow J; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):128-138. PubMed ID: 33811787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones.
    Theunisse HJ; Joemai RM; Maal TJ; Geleijns J; Mylanus EA; Verbist BM
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 25420084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner.
    Koivisto J; Wolff J; Järnstedt J; Dastidar P; Kortesniemi M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25151590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study.
    Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr; 179(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 29040707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective, semi-quantitative image quality analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and MSCT in the diagnosis of distal radius fractures.
    Lang H; Neubauer J; Fritz B; Spira EM; Strube J; Langer M; Kotter E
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4551-4561. PubMed ID: 27003138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Grunz JP; Kunz AS; Gietzen CH; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Schmitt R; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108659. PubMed ID: 31520930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone-Beam CT Compared to Multi-Slice CT for the Diagnostic Analysis of Conductive Hearing Loss: A Feasibility Study.
    Kemp P; Stralen JV; De Graaf P; Berkhout E; Horssen PV; Merkus P
    J Int Adv Otol; 2020 Aug; 16(2):222-226. PubMed ID: 32784161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.