BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178401)

  • 1. An interlaboratory study of the short time exposure (STE) test using SIRC cells for predicting eye irritation potential.
    Takahashi Y; Hayashi T; Koike M; Sakaguchi H; Kuwahara H; Nishiyama N
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Jun; 29(2):77-90. PubMed ID: 20178401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Short Time Exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential: intra-laboratory reproducibility and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) and EU eye irritation classification for 109 chemicals.
    Takahashi Y; Hayashi K; Abo T; Koike M; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1425-34. PubMed ID: 21513790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells.
    Takahashi Y; Koike M; Honda H; Ito Y; Sakaguchi H; Suzuki H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Apr; 22(3):760-70. PubMed ID: 18248950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation study of the Short Time Exposure (STE) test to assess the eye irritation potential of chemicals.
    Sakaguchi H; Ota N; Omori T; Kuwahara H; Sozu T; Takagi Y; Takahashi Y; Tanigawa K; Nakanishi M; Nakamura T; Morimoto T; Wakuri S; Okamoto Y; Sakaguchi M; Hayashi T; Hanji T; Watanabe S
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Jun; 25(4):796-809. PubMed ID: 21291995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-laboratory study of short time exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) classification.
    Takahashi Y; Hayashi T; Watanabe S; Hayashi K; Koike M; Aisawa N; Ebata S; Sakaguchi H; Nakamura T; Kuwahara H; Nishiyama N
    J Toxicol Sci; 2009 Dec; 34(6):611-26. PubMed ID: 19952497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Second-phase validation study of short time exposure test for assessment of eye irritation potency of chemicals.
    Kojima H; Hayashi K; Sakaguchi H; Omori T; Otoizumi T; Sozu T; Kuwahara H; Hayashi T; Sakaguchi M; Toyoda A; Goto H; Watanabe S; Ahiko K; Nakamura T; Morimoto T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Sep; 27(6):1855-69. PubMed ID: 23747838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive performance of the Short Time Exposure test for identifying eye irritation potential of chemical mixtures.
    Saito K; Miyazawa M; Nukada Y; Ei K; Abo T; Sakaguchi H
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Apr; 29(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 25681760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances.
    Hayashi K; Mori T; Abo T; Ooshima K; Hayashi T; Komano T; Takahashi Y; Sakaguchi H; Takatsu A; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22743076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive performance and inter-laboratory reproducibility in assessing eye irritation potential of water- and oil-soluble mixtures using the Short Time Exposure test method.
    Abo T; Hilberer A; Behle-Wagner C; Watanabe M; Cameron D; Kirst A; Nukada Y; Yuki T; Araki D; Sakaguchi H; Itagaki H
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Apr; 48():78-85. PubMed ID: 29305980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Definition of the applicability domain of the Short Time Exposure (STE) test for predicting the eye irritation of chemicals.
    Hayashi K; Abo T; Nukada Y; Sakaguchi H
    Altern Lab Anim; 2013 May; 41(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 23781933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A tiered approach combining the short time exposure (STE) test and the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals.
    Hayashi K; Mori T; Abo T; Koike M; Takahashi Y; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    J Toxicol Sci; 2012; 37(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 22467017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new cell-based method for assessing the eye irritation potential of chemicals: an alternative to the Draize test.
    Cho SA; An S; Lee E; Shin K; Cho JC; Lee TR
    Toxicol Lett; 2012 Jul; 212(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 22595615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches.
    Scott L; Eskes C; Hoffmann S; Adriaens E; Alepée N; Bufo M; Clothier R; Facchini D; Faller C; Guest R; Harbell J; Hartung T; Kamp H; Varlet BL; Meloni M; McNamee P; Osborne R; Pape W; Pfannenbecker U; Prinsen M; Seaman C; Spielmann H; Stokes W; Trouba K; Berghe CV; Goethem FV; Vassallo M; Vinardell P; Zuang V
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19490935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short Time Exposure (STE) test in conjunction with Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay including histopathology to evaluate correspondence with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) eye irritation classification of textile dyes.
    Oliveira GA; Ducas Rdo N; Teixeira GC; Batista AC; Oliveira DP; Valadares MC
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Sep; 29(6):1283-8. PubMed ID: 26026500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
    Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye irritation of low-irritant cosmetic formulations: correlation of in vitro results with clinical data and product composition.
    Debbasch C; Ebenhahn C; Dami N; Pericoi M; Van den Berghe C; Cottin M; Nohynek GJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 15582208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstituted human corneal epithelium: a new alternative to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals and cosmetic products.
    Doucet O; Lanvin M; Thillou C; Linossier C; Pupat C; Merlin B; Zastrow L
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):499-512. PubMed ID: 16243479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Successful prevalidation of the slug mucosal irritation test to assess the eye irritation potency of chemicals.
    Adriaens E; Bytheway H; De Wever B; Eschrich D; Guest R; Hansen E; Vanparys P; Schoeters G; Warren N; Weltens R; Whittingham A; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1285-96. PubMed ID: 18406103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals.
    Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pálovics A; Kismányoki A
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):891-5. PubMed ID: 19226840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
    Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.