179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178530)
1. Comparison of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol solution between nulliparous and multiparous women.
Cheng SY; Hsue CS; Hwang GH; Chen W; Li TC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20178530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
Cheng SY; Chen TC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Labor induction by vaginal misoprostol in grand multiparous women.
Bique C; Bugalho A; Bergström S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Mar; 78(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 10078580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor.
Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-induction cervical ripening with 25 microg and 50 microg vaginal misoprostol in 181 nulliparous parturients.
Szczesny W; Sandvik L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Mar; 22(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 19330712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Castañeda CS; Izquierdo Puente JC; Leon Ochoa RA; Plasse TF; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
