179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178530)
21. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
Uludag S; Salihoglu Saricali F; Madazli R; Cepni I
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Sep; 122(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 15951101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term.
Abramovici D; Goldwasser S; Mabie BC; Mercer BM; Goldwasser R; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1108-12. PubMed ID: 10561627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial.
Cheung PC; Yeo EL; Wong KS; Tang LC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16929421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol and a conventional oral regimen for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Thaisomboon A; Russameecharoen K; Wanitpongpan P; Phattanachindakun B; Changnoi A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jan; 116(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21959071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D; Young DC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 15280123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in nulliparous mothers of twins.
Simões T; Condeço P; Dias E; Ventura P; Matos C; Blickstein I
J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 16519614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women].
Oliveira TA; Melo EM; Aquino MM; Mariani Neto C
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 33(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 21829994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Fisher SA; Mackenzie VP; Davies GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 11641676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Souza AS; Feitosa FE; Costa AA; Pereira AP; Carvalho AS; Paixão RM; Katz L; Amorim MM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 24112746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol.
Colón I; Clawson K; Hunter K; Druzin ML; Taslimi MM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):747-52. PubMed ID: 15746667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Labor induction with 25-microg misoprostol vaginal capsules.
Santo S; Lourenço R; Centeno M; Pargana L; Clode N; Ferreira H; da Graça LM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 68(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 19797903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
