423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178898)
41. Third order harmonic imaging for biological tissues using three phase-coded pulses.
Ma Q; Gong X; Zhang D
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e61-5. PubMed ID: 16844158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Clinical relevance of pressure-dependent scattering at low acoustic pressures.
Emmer M; Vos HJ; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasonics; 2007 Dec; 47(1-4):74-7. PubMed ID: 17845809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Image enhancement by acoustic conditioning of ultrasound contrast agents.
Shi WT; Forsberg F; Bautista R; Vecchio C; Bernardi R; Goldberg BB
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 14998671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Harmonic imaging using multitone nonlinear coding.
Nowicki A; Wójcik J; Secomski W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1112-22. PubMed ID: 17451870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A preliminary in vitro assessment of polymer-shelled microbubbles in contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Sciallero C; Paradossi G; Trucco A
Ultrasonics; 2012 Mar; 52(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 22133737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Fundamental and second-harmonic ultrasound field computation of inhomogeneous nonlinear medium with a generalized angular spectrum method.
Varray F; Ramalli A; Cachard C; Tortoli P; Basset O
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Jul; 58(7):1366-76. PubMed ID: 21768021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Phantom investigation of phase-inversion-based dual-frequency excitation imaging for improved contrast display.
Shen CC; Su SY; Cheng CH; Yeh CK
Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21708393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Application of nonlinear sliding mode control to ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Carroll JM; Lauderbaugh LK; Calvisi ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23862799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior.
Chien CT; Burns PN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Mar; 51(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 15128215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Increasing specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging using the interaction of quasi counter-propagating wavefronts: a proof of concept.
Renaud G; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Oct; 62(10):1768-78. PubMed ID: 26470039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging.
Tang MX; Eckersley RJ
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Dec; 53(12):2406-15. PubMed ID: 17186923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Nonlinear Imaging of Microbubble Contrast Agent Using the Volterra Filter: In Vivo Results.
Du J; Liu D; Ebbini ES
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Dec; 63(12):2069-2081. PubMed ID: 27705855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Sensitivity enhancement of task-evoked fMRI using ensemble empirical mode decomposition.
Lin SH; Lin GH; Tsai PJ; Hsu AL; Lo MT; Yang AC; Lin CP; Wu CW
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 258():56-66. PubMed ID: 26523767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Counter-propagating wave interaction for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Renaud G; Bosch JG; Ten Kate GL; Shamdasani V; Entrekin R; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):L9-18. PubMed ID: 23047302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Nonlinear ultrasonic propagation in bubbly liquids: a numerical model.
Vanhille C; Campos-Pozuelo C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 May; 34(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 18314254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Ultrafast imaging of ultrasound contrast agents.
Couture O; Bannouf S; Montaldo G; Aubry JF; Fink M; Tanter M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1908-16. PubMed ID: 19699026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview.
Cosgrove D
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 16938418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.
Lampaskis M; Averkiou M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 20045592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The Role of Microbubble Echo Phase Lag in Multipulse Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Tremblay-Darveau C; Sheeran PS; Vu CK; Williams R; Zhang Z; Bruce M; Burns PN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29993575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
