These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178937)

  • 1. The role of a change heuristic in judgments of sound intensity.
    Leboe LC; Mondor TA
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 20178937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of a change heuristic in judgments of sound duration.
    Leboe LC; Mondor TA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1122-7. PubMed ID: 19001578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity.
    Olsen KN; Stevens CJ; Tardieu J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1631-44. PubMed ID: 20822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The illusion of increasing loudness in brief steady tones: variation with carrier frequency.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 9042742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Velocity perception for sounds moving in frequency space.
    Henry MJ; McAuley JD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):172-88. PubMed ID: 21258918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of silent gaps on temporal weights in loudness judgments.
    Fischenich A; Hots J; Verhey JL; Oberfeld D
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108028. PubMed ID: 32693189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is 9 louder than 1? Audiovisual cross-modal interactions between number magnitude and judged sound loudness.
    Alards-Tomalin D; Walker AC; Shaw JD; Leboe-McGowan LC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():95-103. PubMed ID: 26218842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal loudness weights: Primacy effects, loudness dominance and their interaction.
    Fischenich A; Hots J; Verhey J; Guldan J; Oberfeld D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261001. PubMed ID: 34941913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plasticity and modified loudness following short-term unilateral deprivation: evidence of multiple gain mechanisms within the auditory system.
    Munro KJ; Turtle C; Schaette R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):315-22. PubMed ID: 24437771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral information for detection of acoustic time to arrival.
    Gordon MS; Russo FA; MacDonald E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):738-50. PubMed ID: 23359354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of impression of vehicle styling on loudness of acceleration sounds in cabin.
    Yoshida J; Igata T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL19-24. PubMed ID: 21786863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting.
    Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1177-88. PubMed ID: 22894236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sound of time: cross-modal convergence in the spatial structuring of time.
    Lakens D; Semin GR; Garrido MV
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 20965749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The growing-louder effect in short diotic stimuli.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH; Ehrenstein WH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8873174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response characteristics of primary auditory cortex neurons underlying perceptual asymmetry of ramped and damped sounds.
    Wang J; Qin L; Chimoto S; Tazunoki S; Sato Y
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 256():309-21. PubMed ID: 24177068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time stretching: Illusory lengthening of filled auditory durations.
    Sasaki T; Nakajima Y; ten Hoopen G; van Buuringen E; Massier B; Kojo T; Kuroda T; Ueda K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1404-21. PubMed ID: 20601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-task interference effects on cross-modal numerical order and sound intensity judgments: the more the louder?
    Alards-Tomalin D; Walker AC; Nepon H; Leboe-McGowan LC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1943-1963. PubMed ID: 27442724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absolute intensity discrimination using two responses.
    Green DM; von Gierke SM; Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):760-6. PubMed ID: 3958316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dependence of loudness evaluation by drivers on vehicle styling.
    Yoshida J; Igata T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3866-73. PubMed ID: 23231117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The simultaneous oddball: Oddball presentation does not affect simultaneity judgments.
    Wehrman J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1654-1668. PubMed ID: 31942702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.