These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178955)

  • 1. Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections.
    Nicholls ME; McIlroy AM
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 20178955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tapping effects on numerical bisection.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Silvanto J; Vallar G; Vecchi T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 208(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 20963580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deaf Individuals Show a Leftward Bias in Numerical Bisection.
    Cattaneo Z; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):156-64. PubMed ID: 26562852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 19951825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1400-7. PubMed ID: 17157335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Cortex; 2005 Aug; 41(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 16042026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Near, yet so far: the effect of pictorial cues on spatial attention.
    Nicholls ME; Forte JD; Loetscher T; Orr CA; Yates MJ; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 21616572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related changes in the allocation of spatially directed focal attention.
    Mańkowska A; Heilman KM; Williamson JB; Michałowski J; Harciarek M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Sep; 27(5):748-764. PubMed ID: 31610738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of focal and global attentional systems on spatial biases.
    Powers RM; Roth HL; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15963382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ineffective leftward search in line bisection and mechanisms of left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Gono S
    J Neurol; 1996 May; 243(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 8741077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listening to numbers affects visual and haptic bisection in healthy individuals and neglect patients.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Mancini F; Mattioli F; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):913-25. PubMed ID: 22326591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudoneglect and neglect for mental alphabet lines.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus AM
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1152():130-8. PubMed ID: 17442278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved Accuracy on Lateralized Spatial Judgments in Healthy Aging.
    Williamson JB; Murphy A; Lamb DG; Schwartz Z; Szeles D; Harciarek M; Mańkowska A; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Nov; 25(10):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 31543083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial frequency-specific effects on the attentional bias: Evidence for two attentional systems.
    Singh VV; Stojanoski B; Le A; Niemeier M
    Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 20447620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.