These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178958)

  • 1. Processing of global and selective stop signals: application of Donders' subtraction method to stop-signal task performance.
    van de Laar MC; van den Wildenberg WP; van Boxtel GJ; van der Molen MW
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 20178958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory effects on response force in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Ko YT; Alsford T; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):465-77. PubMed ID: 22288696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):955-66. PubMed ID: 22268912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Mar; 87(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 14972598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for selective adjustments of inhibitory control in a variant of the stop signal task.
    Xu KZ; Mayse JD; Courtney S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):818-831. PubMed ID: 29589791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The control of deliberate waiting strategies in a stop-signal task.
    Sylwan RP
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 Jun; 37(6):853-62. PubMed ID: 15264029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.
    Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1349-71. PubMed ID: 14578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for capacity sharing when stopping.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():81-95. PubMed ID: 26036922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response inhibition of children with ADHD in the stop-signal task: an event-related potential study.
    Senderecka M; Grabowska A; Szewczyk J; Gerc K; Chmylak R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 21641941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stop-signal task difficulty and the right inferior frontal gyrus.
    Hughes ME; Johnston PJ; Fulham WR; Budd TW; Michie PT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():205-13. PubMed ID: 23973765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stop-signal response inhibition in schizophrenia: behavioural, event-related potential and functional neuroimaging data.
    Hughes ME; Fulham WR; Johnston PJ; Michie PT
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):220-31. PubMed ID: 22027085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.
    van der Schoot M; Licht R; Horsley TM; Sergeant JA
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16014077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The duration of response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm varies with response force.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van Boxtel GJ; van der Molen MW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Oct; 114(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 14529820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm.
    Wessel JR
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28390090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
    Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 21574740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
    Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor response inhibition and execution in the stop-signal task: development and relation to ADHD behaviors.
    Tillman CM; Thorell LB; Brocki KC; Bohlin G
    Child Neuropsychol; 2008 Jan; 14(1):42-59. PubMed ID: 17852128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.