These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20178964)

  • 1. Using the Implicit Association Test as a measure of causal learning does not eliminate effects of rule learning.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 20178964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What are association formation models?
    Dickinson A
    Learn Behav; 2009 Feb; 37(1):21-4; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 19122049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causal competition based on generic priors.
    Powell D; Merrick MA; Lu H; Holyoak KJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 May; 86():62-86. PubMed ID: 26896879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When learning order affects sensitivity to base rates: challenges for theories of causal learning.
    Reips UD; Waldmann MR
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 18271349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test.
    Back MD; Schmukle SC; Egloff B
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(3):167-79. PubMed ID: 16076064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian Theory of Sequential Causal Learning and Abstract Transfer.
    Lu H; Rojas RR; Beckers T; Yuille AL
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Mar; 40(2):404-39. PubMed ID: 25902728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferential dependencies in causal inference: a comparison of belief-distribution and associative approaches.
    Carroll CD; Cheng PW; Lu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):845-63. PubMed ID: 22963188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency of judgment as a context-like determinant of predictive judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Vegas S; Matute H
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1065-75. PubMed ID: 15813490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.
    Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):157-72. PubMed ID: 19210088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 19246341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.