122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20180151)
1. Investigating the impact of selection bias in dose-response analyses of preventive interventions.
McGowan HM; Nix RL; Murphy SA; Bierman KL;
Prev Sci; 2010 Sep; 11(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 20180151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo Simulation Approaches for Quantitative Bias Analysis: A Tutorial.
Banack HR; Hayes-Larson E; Mayeda ER
Epidemiol Rev; 2022 Jan; 43(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 34664653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.
Margolis PA; Stevens R; Bordley WC; Stuart J; Harlan C; Keyes-Elstein L; Wisseh S
Pediatrics; 2001 Sep; 108(3):E42. PubMed ID: 11533360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection effects and prevention program outcomes.
Hill LG; Rosenman R; Tennekoon V; Mandal B
Prev Sci; 2013 Dec; 14(6):557-69. PubMed ID: 23417667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternatives to Randomized Control Trial Designs for Community-Based Prevention Evaluation.
Henry D; Tolan P; Gorman-Smith D; Schoeny M
Prev Sci; 2017 Aug; 18(6):671-680. PubMed ID: 27600286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study.
Rodríguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epidemiology and preventive interventions: parental death in childhood as a case example.
Gersten JC; Beals J; Kallgren CA
Am J Community Psychol; 1991 Aug; 19(4):481-500. PubMed ID: 1755432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The validation of interviews for estimating morbidity.
Kalter H
Health Policy Plan; 1992 Mar; 7(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 10117988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Promoting science-based prevention in communities.
Hawkins JD; Catalano RF; Arthur MW
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(6):951-76. PubMed ID: 12369478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias.
Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3556-75. PubMed ID: 24771662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pilot study of a school-based prevention and early intervention program to reduce oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder.
Winther J; Carlsson A; Vance A
Early Interv Psychiatry; 2014 May; 8(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 23734628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Monte Carlo simulation approach for estimating the health and economic impact of interventions provided at a student-run clinic.
Arenas DJ; Lett E; Klusaritz H; Teitelman AM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189718. PubMed ID: 29284026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of response-guided baseline phase extensions on treatment effect estimates.
Joo SH; Ferron JM; Beretvas SN; Moeyaert M; Van den Noortgate W
Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():77-87. PubMed ID: 29289405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomization-based inference in the presence of selection bias.
Uschner D
Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2212-2229. PubMed ID: 33561882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating causal contrasts involving intermediate variables in the presence of selection bias.
Valeri L; Coull BA
Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(26):4779-4793. PubMed ID: 27411847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Control group formation using propensity score matching: The role of primary and secondary data - Results of prevention studies].
Müller G; Giurgiu M; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Bös K; Kohlmann T; Bombana M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2020 Nov; 156-157():68-74. PubMed ID: 32855075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents.
Martin A; Saunders DH; Shenkin SD; Sproule J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD009728. PubMed ID: 24627300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk.
Vrijheid M; Deltour I; Krewski D; Sanchez M; Cardis E
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 16773122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
