These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20180264)

  • 1. Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy using smooth reaction path generation (SRPG) method: a comparison of the explicit water model, gb/sa model and docking score function.
    Mitomo D; Fukunishi Y; Higo J; Nakamura H
    Genome Inform; 2009 Oct; 23(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 20180264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein-ligand binding free energy calculation by the Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) Method.
    Fukunishi Y; Mitomo D; Nakamura H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Aug; 49(8):1944-51. PubMed ID: 19807195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the frozen atom approximation to the GB/SA continuum model for solvation free energy.
    Guvench O; Weiser J; Shenkin P; Kolossváry I; Still WC
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 11924735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing limitations with the MM-GB/SA scoring procedure using the WaterMap method and free energy perturbation calculations.
    Guimarães CR; Mathiowetz AM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 20235592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuum solvation models in the linear interaction energy method.
    Carlsson J; Andér M; Nervall M; Aqvist J
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Jun; 110(24):12034-41. PubMed ID: 16800513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.
    Zhou R
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):148-61. PubMed ID: 14517967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculation of absolute ligand binding free energy to a ribosome-targeting protein as a function of solvent model.
    Lee MS; Olson MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Oct; 112(42):13411-7. PubMed ID: 18821791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate prediction of protonation state as a prerequisite for reliable MM-PB(GB)SA binding free energy calculations of HIV-1 protease inhibitors.
    Wittayanarakul K; Hannongbua S; Feig M
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(5):673-85. PubMed ID: 17849388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.
    Vorobjev YN; Almagro JC; Hermans J
    Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling loop reorganization free energies of acetylcholinesterase: a comparison of explicit and implicit solvent models.
    Olson MA
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 15481087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretation of the binding affinities of PTP1B inhibitors with the MM-GB/SA method and the X-score scoring function.
    Zhang X; Li X; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1033-48. PubMed ID: 19320460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculations of the free energy of interaction of the c-Fos-c-Jun coiled coil: effects of the solvation model and the inclusion of polarization effects.
    Zuo Z; Gandhi NS; Mancera RL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2201-12. PubMed ID: 21090792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation.
    Pei J; Wang Q; Zhou J; Lai L
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15390269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches.
    Miyamoto S; Kollman PA
    Proteins; 1993 Jul; 16(3):226-45. PubMed ID: 8346190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A water-swap reaction coordinate for the calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energies.
    Woods CJ; Malaisree M; Hannongbua S; Mulholland AJ
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(5):054114. PubMed ID: 21303099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What determines the van der Waals coefficient beta in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?
    Wang W; Wang J; Kollman PA
    Proteins; 1999 Feb; 34(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 10024025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors.
    Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic docking study of the carbohydrate binding module protein of Cel7A with the cellulose Ialpha crystal model.
    Yui T; Shiiba H; Tsutsumi Y; Hayashi S; Miyata T; Hirata F
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Jan; 114(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19928978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crystal molecular dynamics simulations to speed up MM/PB(GB)SA evaluation of binding free energies of di-mannose deoxy analogs with P51G-m4-Cyanovirin-N.
    Vorontsov II; Miyashita O
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(6):1043-53. PubMed ID: 20949512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.