These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20181324)

  • 1. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication and related biases in health services research: a systematic review of empirical evidence.
    Ayorinde AA; Williams I; Mannion R; Song F; Skrybant M; Lilford RJ; Chen YF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):137. PubMed ID: 32487022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
    Schmucker CM; Blümle A; Schell LK; Schwarzer G; Oeller P; Cabrera L; von Elm E; Briel M; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176210. PubMed ID: 28441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study.
    Ayorinde AA; Williams I; Mannion R; Song F; Skrybant M; Lilford RJ; Chen YF
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227580. PubMed ID: 31999702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews].
    Davoli M; Amato L; Minozzi S; Bargagli AM; Vecchi S; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2005; 29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. PubMed ID: 16529350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses.
    Schmucker C; Bluemle A; Briel M; Portalupi S; Lang B; Motschall E; Schwarzer G; Bassler D; Mueller KF; von Elm E; Meerpohl JJ;
    Syst Rev; 2013 May; 2():24. PubMed ID: 23634657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of publication bias required improvement in oral health systematic reviews.
    Koletsi D; Valla K; Fleming PS; Chaimani A; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():118-24. PubMed ID: 26939926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.
    Tricco AC; Tetzlaff J; Sampson M; Fergusson D; Cogo E; Horsley T; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):422-34. PubMed ID: 18394534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Song F; Khan KS; Dinnes J; Sutton AJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 11914301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit.
    Ziai H; Zhang R; Chan AW; Persaud N
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017737. PubMed ID: 28988181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described.
    Mueller KF; Meerpohl JJ; Briel M; Antes G; von Elm E; Lang B; Motschall E; Schwarzer G; Bassler D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():25-33. PubMed ID: 27502970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews.
    Moher D; Pham B; Lawson ML; Klassen TP
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(41):1-90. PubMed ID: 14670218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews.
    Hartling L; Featherstone R; Nuspl M; Shave K; Dryden DM; Vandermeer B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28420349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Investigating the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: A Report of 2 Meta-analyses.
    Roest AM; de Jonge P; Williams CD; de Vries YA; Schoevers RA; Turner EH
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2015 May; 72(5):500-10. PubMed ID: 25806940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 82.