These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
870 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20181388)
1. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design. Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic. Sasse M; Krummel A; Klosa K; Kern M Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):907-15. PubMed ID: 26051232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols. Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations. Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs. Akoğlu B; Gemalmaz D J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 21631629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate-based crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study. Al-Wahadni AM; Hussey DL; Grey N; Hatamleh MM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 19279972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials. Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning. Toman M; Toksavul S; Sarikanat M; Nergiz I; Schmage P Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20397499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture loads of all-ceramic crowns under wet and dry fatigue conditions. Borges GA; Caldas D; Taskonak B; Yan J; Sobrinho LC; de Oliveira WJ J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 19682214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. Malament KA; Socransky SS J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study. Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors. Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns. Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics. Clelland NL; Ramirez A; Katsube N; Seghi RR J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17280887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]