These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20181813)

  • 41. Effect of a Nutrient Rich Foods consumer education program: results from the nutrition advice study.
    Glanz K; Hersey J; Cates S; Muth M; Creel D; Nicholls J; Fulgoni V; Zaripheh S
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Jan; 112(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 22717177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Nutrition Label Viewing during a Food-Selection Task: Front-of-Package Labels vs Nutrition Facts Labels.
    Graham DJ; Heidrick C; Hodgin K
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1636-46. PubMed ID: 25887785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Industry Approach to Nutrition-Based Product Development and Reformulation in Asia.
    Vlassopoulos A; Masset G; Leroy F; Spieldenner J
    J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo); 2015; 61 Suppl():S187-8. PubMed ID: 26598851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sweet Knowledge: How Declaring Added Sugars Will Help Consumers Make Informed Food Choices.
    McDonough SP
    Food Drug Law J; 2015; 70(4):553-71, ii. PubMed ID: 26827391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adding sodium information to casual dining restaurant menus: Beneficial or detrimental for consumers?
    Byrd K; Almanza B; Ghiselli RF; Behnke C; Eicher-Miller HA
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():474-485. PubMed ID: 29501682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Predicting visual attention to nutrition information on food products: the influence of motivation and ability.
    Turner MM; Skubisz C; Pandya SP; Silverman M; Austin LL
    J Health Commun; 2014 Sep; 19(9):1017-29. PubMed ID: 24555542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An independent audit of the Australian food industry's voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme for energy-dense nutrition-poor foods.
    Carter OB; Mills BW; Lloyd E; Phan T
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Jan; 67(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 23169468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fine bakery wares with label claims in Europe and their categorisation by nutrient profiling models.
    Trichterborn J; Harzer G; Kunz C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Mar; 65(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 21179051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. US Consumers' Understanding of Nutrition Labels in 2013: The Importance of Health Literacy.
    Persoskie A; Hennessy E; Nelson WL
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2017 Sep; 14():E86. PubMed ID: 28957033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Nutrition Labeling for Foods: Which Approaches Are Useful?
    Schneemann BO
    World Rev Nutr Diet; 2020; 121():166-175. PubMed ID: 33502352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling.
    van Kleef E; van Trijp H; Paeps F; Fernández-Celemín L
    Public Health Nutr; 2008 Feb; 11(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 17601362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Nutrient-rich foods: applying nutrient navigation systems to improve public health.
    Drewnowski A; Fulgoni VL; Young MK; Pitman S
    J Food Sci; 2008 Nov; 73(9):H222-8. PubMed ID: 19021805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Food Rating Scale in Food Services: From Development to Assessment of a Strategy for Consumer Healthier Choices.
    Mazocco L; Akutsu RCCA; Botelho RBA; Da Silva ICR; Adjafre R; Zandonadi RP
    Nutrients; 2018 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 30223477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Food labels: a critical assessment.
    Temple NJ; Fraser J
    Nutrition; 2014 Mar; 30(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 24139165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Consumer Understanding, Perception and Interpretation of Serving Size Information on Food Labels: A Scoping Review.
    Van der Horst K; Bucher T; Duncanson K; Murawski B; Labbe D
    Nutrients; 2019 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31514395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Nutrient-specific system versus full fact panel: Testing the benefits of nutrient-specific front-of-package labels in a student sample.
    Carter KA; González-Vallejo C
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():512-526. PubMed ID: 29518468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Physical activity equivalent labeling vs. calorie labeling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Seyedhamzeh S; Bagheri M; Keshtkar AA; Qorbani M; Viera AJ
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2018 Sep; 15(1):88. PubMed ID: 30217210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling systems: a missed opportunity?
    Emrich TE; Arcand J; L'Abbé MR
    Can J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 103(4):e260-2. PubMed ID: 23618637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perceptions of university students regarding calories, food healthiness, and the importance of calorie information in menu labelling.
    Fernandes AC; de Oliveira RC; Rodrigues VM; Fiates GM; da Costa Proença RP
    Appetite; 2015 Aug; 91():173-8. PubMed ID: 25865662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.