126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20182064)
1. Real-time control of combined surface water quantity and quality: polder flushing.
Xu M; van Overloop PJ; van de Giesen NC; Stelling GS
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):869-78. PubMed ID: 20182064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulsed pumping process optimization using a potential flow model.
Tenney CM; Lastoskie CM
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):111-21. PubMed ID: 17350717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simplified model for reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: application of the Young conflict resolution theory.
Shirangi E; Kerachian R; Bajestan MS
Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Nov; 146(1-3):77-89. PubMed ID: 18204972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parameter optimisation of real-time control strategies for urban wastewater systems.
Schütze M; Butler D; Beck MB
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):139-46. PubMed ID: 11385840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of existing disinfection models.
Andrianarison T; Jupsin H; Ouali A; Vasel JL
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):955-62. PubMed ID: 20182074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RTC simulations on large branched sewer systems with SmaRTControl.
de Korte K; van Beest D; van der Plaat M; de Graaf E; Schaart N
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 19633390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Set-up of a decision support system to support sustainable development of the Laguna de Bay, Philippines.
Nauta TA; Bongco AE; Santos-Borja AC
Mar Pollut Bull; 2003; 47(1-6):211-8. PubMed ID: 12787622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study.
Stare A; Vrecko D; Hvala N; Strmcnik S
Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):2004-14. PubMed ID: 17346768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current state and development of the real-time control of the Berlin sewage system.
Schroeder K; Pawlowsky-Reusing E
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):181-7. PubMed ID: 16477985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simulation/optimization model for selecting infrastructure alternatives in complex water resource systems.
Arena C; Mazzola MR; Scordo G
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(12):3050-60. PubMed ID: 20555201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Operational water quantity management in a river basin.
Morgenschweis G; Brudy-Zippelius T; Ihringer J
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(10):111-8. PubMed ID: 15137160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of control strategy and simulation in anoxic-oxic nitrogen removal process.
Peng YZ; Wang ZH; Whang SY
J Environ Sci (China); 2005; 17(3):425-8. PubMed ID: 16083116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model reduction through boundary relocation to facilitate real-time control optimisation in the integrated urban wastewater system.
Meirlaen J; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):373-81. PubMed ID: 11936656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards a global multi objective optimization of wastewater treatment plant based on modeling and genetic algorithms.
Béraud B; Steyer JP; Lemoine C; Latrille E; Manic G; Printemps-Vacquier C
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):109-16. PubMed ID: 18025738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confronting limitations: new solutions required for urban water management in Kunming City.
Huang DB; Bader HP; Scheidegger R; Schertenleib R; Gujer W
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 16857309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of real time control of sewer systems on treatment plant performance and receiving water quality.
Frehmann T; Niemann A; Ustohal P; Geiger WF
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11902474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Climate change impacts on activated sludge wastewater treatment: a case study from Norway.
Plósz BG; Liltved H; Ratnaweera H
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 19633397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimising operation of a biological wastewater treatment application.
Murphy RB; Young BR; Kecman V
ISA Trans; 2009 Jan; 48(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 18762295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified calibration protocol evaluated in a model-based testing of SBR flexibility.
Corominas L; Sin G; Puig S; Balaguer MD; Vanrolleghem PA; Colprim J
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2011 Feb; 34(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 20711611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reuse rate of treated wastewater in water reuse system.
Fan YB; Yang WB; Li G; Wu LL; Wei YS
J Environ Sci (China); 2005; 17(5):842-5. PubMed ID: 16313015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
