These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

744 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20182071)

  • 41. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments.
    Phillip WA; Yong JS; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5170-6. PubMed ID: 20527762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Forward osmosis membrane modular configurations for osmotic dilution of seawater by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis hybrid system.
    Kim JE; Phuntsho S; Ali SM; Choi JY; Shon HK
    Water Res; 2018 Jan; 128():183-192. PubMed ID: 29102697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of natural surface water with ultrasound enhanced backwashing.
    Boley A; Narasimhan K; Kieninger M; Müller WR
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1121-7. PubMed ID: 20220233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fatty acid fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation.
    Ang WS; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2008 Oct; 42(16):4393-403. PubMed ID: 18760439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of hydrodynamic operating conditions on organic fouling of spiral-wound forward osmosis membranes: Fouling-induced performance deterioration in FO-RO hybrid system.
    Lee C; Nguyen TT; Adha RS; Shon HK; Kim IS
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116154. PubMed ID: 32823194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Modeling full-scale osmotic membrane bioreactor systems with high sludge retention and low salt concentration factor for wastewater reclamation.
    Park SH; Park B; Shon HK; Kim S
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Aug; 190():508-15. PubMed ID: 25840775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of a bench-scale membrane fouling protocol to determine fouling propensities of membranes during full-scale water reuse applications.
    Bellona CL; Wuertle A; Xu P; Drewes JE
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 20818065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Performance of ultrafiltration membrane process combined with coagulation/sedimentation.
    Jang NY; Watanabe Y; Minegishi S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):209-19. PubMed ID: 16003980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Application of volume-retarded osmosis and low-pressure membrane hybrid process for water reclamation.
    Im SJ; Choi J; Lee JG; Jeong S; Jang A
    Chemosphere; 2018 Mar; 194():76-84. PubMed ID: 29197818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The application of forward osmosis for simulated surface water treatment by using trisodium citrate as draw solute.
    Yang S; Gao B; Zhao P; Wang C; Shen X; Yue Q; Shon HK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8585-8593. PubMed ID: 30710329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes.
    Coday BD; Heil DM; Xu P; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2386-93. PubMed ID: 23363015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bidirectional permeation of electrolytes in osmotically driven membrane processes.
    Hancock NT; Phillip WA; Elimelech M; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10642-51. PubMed ID: 22035269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes.
    Ge Q; Su J; Amy GL; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1318-26. PubMed ID: 22239906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
    Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate.
    Holloway RW; Childress AE; Dennett KE; Cath TY
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):4005-14. PubMed ID: 17604810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Innovative stimuli-responsive membrane MSF brine rejection dilution by tertiary treated sewage effluent.
    Khanafer D; Altaee A; Hawari AH; Zhou J; Alsaka L
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 365():121517. PubMed ID: 38908153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane.
    Yip NY; Tiraferri A; Phillip WA; Schiffman JD; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3812-8. PubMed ID: 20408540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fabrication and performance of PET mesh enhanced cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis.
    Li G; Wang J; Hou D; Bai Y; Liu H
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Jul; 45():7-17. PubMed ID: 27372114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Scale-up of osmotic membrane bioreactors by modeling salt accumulation and draw solution dilution using hollow-fiber membrane characteristics and operation conditions.
    Kim S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():88-95. PubMed ID: 24746768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.