BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20182079)

  • 1. Post-treatment of UASB reactor effluent in waste stabilization ponds and in horizontal flow constructed wetlands: a comparative study in pilot scale in Southeast Brazil.
    Bastos RK; Calijuri ML; Bevilacqua PD; Rios EN; Dias EH; Capelete BC; Magalhães TB
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):995-1002. PubMed ID: 20182079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between polishing (maturation) ponds and subsurface flow constructed wetlands (planted and unplanted) for the post-treatment of the effluent from UASB reactors.
    von Sperling M; Dornelas FL; Assunção FA; de Paoli AC; Mabub MO
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1201-9. PubMed ID: 20220242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parasite removal by natural wastewater treatment systems: performance of waste stabilisation ponds and constructed wetlands.
    Stott R; Mayr E; Mara DD
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 14510199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of E. coli and helminth eggs in UASB: Polishing pond systems in Brazil.
    von Sperling M; Bastos RK; Kato MT
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(12):91-7. PubMed ID: 16114668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of very shallow ponds treating effluents from UASB reactors.
    von Sperling M; Mascarenhas LC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(12):83-90. PubMed ID: 16114667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of nutrient cycling in a surface-flow constructed wetland and in a facultative pond treating secondary effluent.
    Sajn Slak A; Bulc TG; Vrhovsek D
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(12):291-8. PubMed ID: 16114697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of planted and unplanted subsurface-flow constructed wetlands for the post-treatment of UASB reactor effluents.
    Dornelas FL; Machado MB; von Sperling M
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(12):3025-33. PubMed ID: 19955625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of UASB reactor systems with and without post-treatment.
    Oliveira SC; von Sperling M
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1299-306. PubMed ID: 19380994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. UASB-polishing ponds design parameters: contributions from a pilot scale study in southeast Brazil.
    Bastos RK; Rios EN; Bevilacqua PD; Andrade RC
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(6):1276-81. PubMed ID: 21436567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbiological quality of a waste stabilization pond effluent used for restricted irrigation in Valle Del Cauca, Colombia.
    Madera CA; Peña MR; Mara DD
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 11833728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential of constructed wetlands in treating the eutrophic water: evidence from Taihu Lake of China.
    Li L; Li Y; Biswas DK; Nian Y; Jiang G
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Apr; 99(6):1656-63. PubMed ID: 17532209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polishing ponds for post-treatment of digested sewage. Part 1: Flow-through ponds.
    Cavalcanti PF; van Haandel A; Lettinga G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 11575089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience in non-conventional wastewater treatment techniques used in the Czech Republic.
    Felberova L; Kucera J; Mlejnska E
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):149-56. PubMed ID: 17881848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agricultural reuse of the secondary effluent polished by an algal pond system coupled with constructed wetland.
    Kim Y; Lee DR; Giokas D
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):79-86. PubMed ID: 15536993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathogen removal efficiency from UASB + BF effluent using conventional and UV post-treatment systems.
    Keller R; Passamani-Franca RF; Passamani F; Vaz L; Cassini ST; Sherrer N; Rubim K; Sant'Ana TD; Gonçalves RF
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15318478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of physico-chemical pretreatment on the removal efficiency of horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands.
    Caselles-Osorio A; Garcia J
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Mar; 146(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16996180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nutrient removal from piggery effluent using vertical flow constructed wetlands in southern Brazil.
    Sezerino PH; Reginatto V; Santos MA; Kayser K; Kunst S; Philippi LS; Soares HM
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 14510203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructed wetlands and waste stabilization ponds for small rural communities in the United Kingdom: a comparison of land area requirements, performance and costs.
    Mara DD
    Environ Technol; 2006 Jul; 27(7):753-7. PubMed ID: 16894819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dairy farm wastewater treatment by an advanced pond system.
    Craggs RJ; Tanner CC; Sukias JP; Davies-Colley RJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 14510223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of free water surface constructed wetlands as polishing step in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse.
    Ghermandi A; Bixio D; Thoeye C
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Jul; 380(1-3):247-58. PubMed ID: 17289115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.