BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20183128)

  • 1. Applying the digital image correlation method to estimate the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms subjected to a wall shear stress.
    Mathias JD; Stoodley P
    Biofouling; 2009 Nov; 25(8):695-703. PubMed ID: 20183128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties.
    Klapper I; Rupp CJ; Cargo R; Purvedorj B; Stoodley P
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Nov; 80(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 12226861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Textural fingerprints: a comprehensive descriptor for biofilm structure development.
    Milferstedt K; Pons MN; Morgenroth E
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Aug; 100(5):889-901. PubMed ID: 18551529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena.
    Stoodley P; Cargo R; Rupp CJ; Wilson S; Klapper I
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 29(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12483479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of fluid shear and AICI3 on the material properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Desulfovibrio sp. EX265 biofilms.
    Stoodley P; Jacobsen A; Dunsmore BC; Purevdorj B; Wilson S; Lappin-Scott HM; Costerton JW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(6):113-20. PubMed ID: 11381956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of flow cell geometry related shear stresses on the distribution, structure and susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 01 biofilms.
    Salek MM; Jones SM; Martinuzzi RJ
    Biofouling; 2009 Nov; 25(8):711-25. PubMed ID: 20183130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel microfluidic device for the in situ optical and mechanical analysis of bacterial biofilms.
    Mosier AP; Kaloyeros AE; Cady NC
    J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Oct; 91(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 22796059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of biofilm mechanical properties from tensile tests performed using a micro-cantilever method.
    Aggarwal S; Hozalski RM
    Biofouling; 2010 May; 26(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 20390563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of fluid shear on the structure and material properties of sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms.
    Dunsmore BC; Jacobsen A; Hall-Stoodley L; Bass CJ; Lappin-Scott HM; Stoodley P
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 29(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 12483477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of calcium ions on the mechanical properties of a model biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Körstgens V; Flemming HC; Wingender J; Borchard W
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(6):49-57. PubMed ID: 11381972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resolution of axial shear strain elastography.
    Thitaikumar A; Righetti R; Krouskop TA; Ophir J
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5245-57. PubMed ID: 17019036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental investigation of the elastic-plastic deformation of mineralized lobster cuticle by digital image correlation.
    Sachs C; Fabritius H; Raabe D
    J Struct Biol; 2006 Sep; 155(3):409-25. PubMed ID: 16899374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of wall shear rate on biofilm deposition and grazing in drinking water flow chambers.
    Paris T; Skali-Lami S; Block JC
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Aug; 97(6):1550-61. PubMed ID: 17216655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homogenization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms visualized by freeze-substitution electron microscopy.
    Guélon T; Hunter RC; Mathias JD; Deffuant G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 May; 110(5):1405-18. PubMed ID: 23239457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of shear stress on growth, adhesion and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with antibiotic-induced morphological changes.
    Fonseca AP; Sousa JC
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2007 Sep; 30(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17574822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and testing of a novel microcantilever technique for measuring the cohesive strength of intact biofilms.
    Aggarwal S; Poppele EH; Hozalski RM
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Apr; 105(5):924-34. PubMed ID: 19953669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring local flow velocities and biofilm structure in biofilm systems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
    Manz B; Volke F; Goll D; Horn H
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Nov; 84(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 14574699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of hydrodynamics on oral biofilm strength.
    Paramonova E; Kalmykowa OJ; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Sharma PK
    J Dent Res; 2009 Oct; 88(10):922-6. PubMed ID: 19783800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cohesiveness and hydrodynamic properties of young drinking water biofilms.
    Abe Y; Skali-Lami S; Block JC; Francius G
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1155-66. PubMed ID: 22221338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the calculation of the elastic modulus of a biofilm streamer.
    Aravas N; Laspidou CS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Sep; 101(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 18383138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.