151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20185114)
1. Distinguishing epicardial fat from scar: analysis of electrograms using high-density electroanatomic mapping in a novel porcine infarct model.
Tung R; Nakahara S; Ramirez R; Lai C; Fishbein MC; Shivkumar K
Heart Rhythm; 2010 Mar; 7(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 20185114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined epicardial and endocardial electroanatomic mapping in a porcine model of healed myocardial infarction.
Reddy VY; Wrobleski D; Houghtaling C; Josephson ME; Ruskin JN
Circulation; 2003 Jul; 107(25):3236-42. PubMed ID: 12796129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of electrogram characteristics during sinus rhythm to delineate the endocardial scar in a porcine model of healed myocardial infarction.
Wrobleski D; Houghtaling C; Josephson ME; Ruskin JN; Reddy VY
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 May; 14(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 12776871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of combined endocardial and epicardial electroanatomic mapping of a reperfused porcine infarct model: a comparison of electrofield and magnetic systems with histopathologic correlation.
Tung R; Nakahara S; Ramirez R; Gui D; Magyar C; Lai C; Fishbein M; Shivkumar K
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Mar; 8(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 21056123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electroanatomic characterization of post-infarct scars comparison with 3-dimensional myocardial scar reconstruction based on magnetic resonance imaging.
Codreanu A; Odille F; Aliot E; Marie PY; Magnin-Poull I; Andronache M; Mandry D; Djaballah W; Régent D; Felblinger J; de Chillou C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 52(10):839-42. PubMed ID: 18755347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of myocardial scars: electrophysiological imaging correlates in a porcine infarct model.
Nakahara S; Vaseghi M; Ramirez RJ; Fonseca CG; Lai CK; Finn JP; Mahajan A; Boyle NG; Shivkumar K
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jul; 8(7):1060-7. PubMed ID: 21354335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of scar in cardiac MRI and high-resolution contact mapping of left ventricle in a chronic infarct model.
Thajudeen A; Jackman WM; Stewart B; Cokic I; Nakagawa H; Shehata M; Amorn AM; Kali A; Liu E; Harlev D; Bennett N; Dharmakumar R; Chugh SS; Wang X
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):663-74. PubMed ID: 25656924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endocardial infarct scar recognition by myocardial electrical impedance is not influenced by changes in cardiac activation sequence.
Amorós-Figueras G; Jorge E; Alonso-Martin C; Traver D; Ballesta M; Bragós R; Rosell-Ferrer J; Cinca J
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Apr; 15(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 29197656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scar voltage threshold determination using ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging integration in a porcine infarct model: Influence of interelectrode distances and three-dimensional spatial effects of scar.
Tung R; Kim S; Yagishita D; Vaseghi M; Ennis DB; Ouadah S; Ajijola OA; Bradfield JS; Mahapatra S; Finn P; Shivkumar K
Heart Rhythm; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1993-2002. PubMed ID: 27392944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging of chronic myocardial infarct scar.
Horáček BM; Wang L; Dawoud F; Xu J; Sapp JL
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(6):952-8. PubMed ID: 26415018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrogram characteristics in postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: effect of infarct age.
Bogun F; Krishnan S; Siddiqui M; Good E; Marine JE; Schuger C; Oral H; Chugh A; Pelosi F; Morady F
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):667-74. PubMed ID: 16098433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unipolar Endocardial Voltage Mapping in the Right Ventricle: Optimal Cutoff Values Correcting for Computed Tomography-Derived Epicardial Fat Thickness and Their Clinical Value for Substrate Delineation.
Venlet J; Piers SRD; Kapel GFL; de Riva M; Pauli PFG; van der Geest RJ; Zeppenfeld K
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28798020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel multielectrode catheter for high-density ventricular mapping: electrogram characterization and utility for scar mapping.
Barkagan M; Sroubek J; Shapira-Daniels A; Yavin H; Jang J; Nezafat R; Anter E
Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):440-449. PubMed ID: 31985784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The electrophysiological cardiac ventricular substrate in patients after myocardial infarction: noninvasive characterization with electrocardiographic imaging.
Cuculich PS; Zhang J; Wang Y; Desouza KA; Vijayakumar R; Woodard PK; Rudy Y
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 58(18):1893-902. PubMed ID: 22018301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New insight into scar-related ventricular tachycardia circuits in ischemic cardiomyopathy: Fat deposition after myocardial infarction on computed tomography--A pilot study.
Sasaki T; Calkins H; Miller CF; Zviman MM; Zipunnikov V; Arai T; Sawabe M; Terashima M; Marine JE; Berger RD; Nazarian S; Zimmerman SL
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1508-18. PubMed ID: 25814415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-Resolution Mapping of Ventricular Scar: Evaluation of a Novel Integrated Multielectrode Mapping and Ablation Catheter.
Leshem E; Tschabrunn CM; Jang J; Whitaker J; Zilberman I; Beeckler C; Govari A; Kautzner J; Peichl P; Nezafat R; Anter E
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Mar; 3(3):220-231. PubMed ID: 29759516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standard peak-to-peak bipolar voltage amplitude criteria underestimate myocardial scar during substrate mapping with a novel microelectrode catheter.
Lee A; Walters TE; Alhede C; Vittinghoff E; Sievers R; Gerstenfeld EP
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Mar; 17(3):476-484. PubMed ID: 31606463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of high-resolution electroanatomic mapping of the left ventricle using a multispline basket catheter in a swine model of chronic myocardial infarction.
Tanaka Y; Genet M; Chuan Lee L; Martin AJ; Sievers R; Gerstenfeld EP
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jan; 12(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25173890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epicardial substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a new algorithm to differentiate between scar and viable myocardium developed by simultaneous integration of computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Piers SR; van Huls van Taxis CF; Tao Q; van der Geest RJ; Askar SF; Siebelink HM; Schalij MJ; Zeppenfeld K
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(8):586-96. PubMed ID: 23161702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiologic Scar Substrate in Relation to VT: Noninvasive High-Resolution Mapping and Risk Assessment with ECGI.
Zhang J; Cooper DH; Desouza KA; Cuculich PS; Woodard PK; Smith TW; Rudy Y
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Aug; 39(8):781-91. PubMed ID: 27197804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
