These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2018612)

  • 1. [Manual instrumentation of root canals. Review of the last decade].
    Roig Cayón M; Basilio Monne J; Canalda Sahli C
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1991 Jan; 7(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 2018612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
    Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. 1.
    al-Omari MA; Dummer PM; Newcombe RG
    Int Endod J; 1992 Mar; 25(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 1399054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Root canal instruments are poorly standardized.
    Stenman E; Spångberg LS
    J Endod; 1993 Jul; 19(7):327-34. PubMed ID: 8245754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques.
    Myers GL; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):275-9. PubMed ID: 1940753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
    Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
    Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. 2.
    al-Omari MA; Dummer PM; Newcombe RG; Doller R
    Int Endod J; 1992 Mar; 25(2):67-81. PubMed ID: 1399055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1989 Oct; 15(10):457-62. PubMed ID: 2639937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Canal Master files: scanning electron microscopic evaluation of new instruments and their wear with clinical usage.
    Zuolo ML; Walton RE; Murgel CA
    J Endod; 1992 Jul; 18(7):336-9. PubMed ID: 1402596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals.
    Schäfer E; Zapke K
    J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study.
    Schäfer E
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):685-9. PubMed ID: 9220756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Reddy SA; Hicks ML
    J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
    Hülsmann M; Stryga F
    J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.