These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Use of rapidly hardening hydroxyapatite cement for facial contouring surgery. Lee DW; Kim JY; Lew DH J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1084-8. PubMed ID: 20613576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porous hydroxyapatite as an onlay bone-graft substitute for maxillofacial surgery. Salyer KE; Hall CD Plast Reconstr Surg; 1989 Aug; 84(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 2546169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 1-year study of hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: III. Comparison with autogenous bone graft for facial augmentation. Gosain AK; Riordan PA; Song L; Amarante MT; Kalantarian B; Nagy PG; Wilson CR; Toth JM; McIntyre BL Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 16163093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxyapatite paste (BoneSource) used as an onlay implant for supraorbital and malar augmentation. Stelnicki EJ; Ousterhout DK J Craniofac Surg; 1997 Sep; 8(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 9482077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osteogenic response to porous hydroxyapatite ceramics under the skin of dogs. Yamasaki H; Sakai H Biomaterials; 1992; 13(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 1318086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Korovessis P; Koureas G; Zacharatos S; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E Eur Spine J; 2005 Sep; 14(7):630-8. PubMed ID: 15789231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The aging midfacial skeleton: implications for rejuvenation and reconstruction using implants. Matros E; Momoh A; Yaremchuk MJ Facial Plast Surg; 2009 Nov; 25(4):252-9. PubMed ID: 19924598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osteogenic response to hydroxyapatite-fibrin implants in maxillofacial bone defects. Bonucci E; Marini E; Valdinucci F; Fortunato G Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Dec; 105(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 9469605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 1-year study of osteoinduction in hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: part I. Gosain AK; Song L; Riordan P; Amarante MT; Nagy PG; Wilson CR; Toth JM; Ricci JL Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Feb; 109(2):619-30. PubMed ID: 11818845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional soft tissue change after paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene. Kwon TG; Kang SM; Hwang HD Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 24685262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal volume enhancement: implants and osteotomies. Zim S Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Aug; 12(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15252260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The versatility of hydroxyapatite blocks in maxillofacial surgery. Frame JW; Brady CL Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Dec; 25(6):452-64. PubMed ID: 2825758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-density porous polyethylene for facial bone augmentation. Odum BC; Bussard GM; Lewis RP; Lara WC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 10177457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous, block hydroxyapatite as an interpositional bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery. Rosen HM Plast Reconstr Surg; 1989 Jun; 83(6):985-90; discussion 991-3. PubMed ID: 2727171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]