BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20186424)

  • 1. A comparison of the physiological consequences of head-loading and back-loading for African and European women.
    Lloyd R; Parr B; Davies S; Partridge T; Cooke C
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2010 Jul; 109(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 20186424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective perceptions of load carriage on the head and back in Xhosa women.
    Lloyd R; Parr B; Davies S; Cooke C
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 19926071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A kinetic comparison of back-loading and head-loading in Xhosa women.
    Lloyd R; Parr B; Davies S; Cooke C
    Ergonomics; 2011 Apr; 54(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 21491280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energy-saving gait mechanics with head-supported loads.
    Heglund NC; Willems PA; Penta M; Cavagna GA
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6526):52-4. PubMed ID: 7723841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energetics of load carrying in Nepalese porters.
    Bastien GJ; Schepens B; Willems PA; Heglund NC
    Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1755. PubMed ID: 15961662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peak performance and cardiometabolic responses of modern US army soldiers during heavy, fatiguing vest-borne load carriage.
    Arcidiacono DM; Lavoie EM; Potter AW; Vangala SV; Holden LD; Soucy HY; Karis AJ; Friedl KE; Santee WR; Looney DP
    Appl Ergon; 2023 May; 109():103985. PubMed ID: 36764233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and metabolic effects of varying backpack loading on simulated marching.
    Quesada PM; Mengelkoch LJ; Hale RC; Simon SR
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 10755654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of modern military backpack loads on walking speed and cardiometabolic responses of US Army Soldiers.
    Looney DP; Doughty EM; Figueiredo PS; Vangala SV; Pryor JL; Santee WR; McClung HL; Potter AW
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jul; 94():103395. PubMed ID: 33652153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of economy and sagittal plane trunk movements among back-, back/front- and head-loading.
    Hudson S; Cooke C; Davies S; West S; Gamieldien R; Low C; Lloyd R
    Ergonomics; 2018 Sep; 61(9):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 29757714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ergonomic effects of load carriage on the upper and lower back on metabolic energy cost of walking.
    Abe D; Muraki S; Yasukouchi A
    Appl Ergon; 2008 May; 39(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 17850760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of load carriage on movement kinematics and respiratory parameters in children during walking.
    Li JX; Hong Y; Robinson PD
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Sep; 90(1-2):35-43. PubMed ID: 12783230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The energetic, kinematic and kinetic responses to load carried on the back, on the head and in a doublepack.
    Hudson S; Vanwanseele B; Barwood M; Low C; Cooke C; Lloyd R
    Ergonomics; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1191-1204. PubMed ID: 33830853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treadmill load carriage overestimates energy expenditure of overground load carriage.
    Vickery-Howe DM; Drain JR; Clarke AC; Dascombe BJ; McWilliam JT; Middleton KJ
    Ergonomics; 2021 Apr; 64(4):521-531. PubMed ID: 33078677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of thoracic load carriage up to 45 kg on the cardiopulmonary response to exercise.
    Phillips DB; Ehnes CM; Stickland MK; Petersen SR
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Sep; 116(9):1725-34. PubMed ID: 27395054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No physiological or biomechanical sex-by-load interactions during treadmill-based load carriage.
    Vickery-Howe DM; Clarke AC; Drain JR; Dascombe BJ; Middleton KJ
    Ergonomics; 2020 Sep; 63(9):1175-1181. PubMed ID: 32441225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Extra Load Index as a method for comparing the relative economy of load carriage systems.
    Lloyd R; Hind K; Parr B; Davies S; Cooke C
    Ergonomics; 2010 Dec; 53(12):1500-4. PubMed ID: 21108086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energetic cost of carrying loads: have African women discovered an economic way?
    Maloiy GM; Heglund NC; Prager LM; Cavagna GA; Taylor CR
    Nature; 1986 Feb 20-26; 319(6055):668-9. PubMed ID: 3951538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-individual variability in load carriage economy and comparisons between different load conditions.
    Hudson S; Cooke C; Davies S; West S; Gamieldien R; Low C; Lloyd R
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102968. PubMed ID: 31600713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soldiers' load carriage performance in high mountains: a physiological study.
    Chatterjee T; Bhattacharyya D; Pramanik A; Pal M; Majumdar D; Majumdar D
    Mil Med Res; 2017; 4():6. PubMed ID: 28239483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of load carriage, load position, and walking speed on energy cost of walking.
    Abe D; Yanagawa K; Niihata S
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Jul; 35(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 15159197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.