These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20186441)

  • 1. Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine.
    Busscher I; Ploegmakers JJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1104-14. PubMed ID: 20186441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.
    Sheng SR; Xu HZ; Wang YL; Zhu QA; Mao FM; Lin Y; Wang XY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148610. PubMed ID: 26866593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the porcine spine: a comparative study with multidetector computed tomography and anatomical specimens.
    de Freitas RM; Andrade CS; Caldas JG; Kanas AF; Cabral RH; Tsunemi MH; Rodríguez HJ; Rabbani SR
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):992-9. PubMed ID: 25614150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relevant Anatomic and Morphological Measurements of the Rat Spine: Considerations for Rodent Models of Human Spine Trauma.
    Jaumard NV; Leung J; Gokhale AJ; Guarino BB; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1084-92. PubMed ID: 26731709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative morphometry of L4 vertebrae: comparison of large animal models for the human lumbar spine.
    McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):E200-6. PubMed ID: 11935119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.
    Sheng SR; Wang XY; Xu HZ; Zhu GQ; Zhou YF
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Jan; 19(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19876658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of CAOS as a training model in spinal surgery: a randomised study.
    Richards PJ; Kurta IC; Jasani V; Jones CH; Rahmatalla A; Mackenzie G; Dove J
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 16683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine.
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Wenger KH; Claes LE
    Anat Rec; 1997 Apr; 247(4):542-55. PubMed ID: 9096794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphometric comparison of the pedicle rib unit to pedicles in the thoracic spine.
    Husted DS; Haims AH; Fairchild TA; Kershaw TS; Yue JJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 14722404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomic basis of anterior and posterior instrumentation of the spine: morphometric study.
    Abuzayed B; Tutunculer B; Kucukyuruk B; Tuzgen S
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2010 Jan; 32(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19696959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomical measurements of porcine lumbar vertebrae.
    Dath R; Ebinesan AD; Porter KM; Miles AW
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jun; 22(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 17360085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomographic-based morphometric study of thoracic spine and its relevance to anaesthetic and spinal surgical procedures.
    Kaur K; Singh R; Prasath V; Magu S; Tanwar M
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2016; 7(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 27182147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphometry of the kangaroo spine and its comparison with human spinal data.
    Wilke HJ; Betz VM; Kienle A
    J Anat; 2021 Mar; 238(3):626-642. PubMed ID: 33025596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomy of deer spine and its comparison to the human spine.
    Kumar N; Kukreti S; Ishaque M; Mulholland R
    Anat Rec; 2000 Oct; 260(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 10993955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques.
    Ludwig SC; Kramer DL; Balderston RA; Vaccaro AR; Foley KF; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(13):1655-67. PubMed ID: 10870141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions.
    Panjabi MM; Duranceau J; Goel V; Oxland T; Takata K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Aug; 16(8):861-9. PubMed ID: 1948369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical and anatomical considerations in lumbar spinous process fixation--an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Sun X; Murgatroyd AA; Mullinix KP; Cunningham BW; Ma X; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2208-15. PubMed ID: 24614251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro biomechanical characteristics of the spine: a comparison between human and porcine spinal segments.
    Busscher I; van der Veen AJ; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):E35-42. PubMed ID: 20081499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and Reliability of Computer-aided Anatomical Measurements for Vertebral Body and Disc Based on Computed Tomography Scans.
    Yao J; Dong B; Sun J; Liu JT; Liu F; Li XW; Yuan PW; Zhang JB
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Aug; 12(4):1182-1189. PubMed ID: 32618427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental Model for Interlaminar Endoscopic Spine Procedures.
    Amato MCM; Aprile BC; de Oliveira CA; Carneiro VM; de Oliveira RS
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():55-61. PubMed ID: 31152884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.